DOJ-OGR-00013282.jpg
546 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
546 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge (The Court), defense attorney Ms. Menninger, and prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach regarding a potential witness named Brian. The defense is weighing the risks of calling Brian due to his prior inconsistent statements regarding his sister, while the prosecution notes that Brian has already left the district as he is no longer a government witness.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding witness subpoenas.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Discussing the strategic decision of whether to call 'Brian' as a witness due to inconsistent statements.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Prosecutor (Government) |
Informing the court that the witness has left the district.
|
| Brian | Potential Witness |
A potential witness the government decided not to call; the defense is debating subpoenaing him. He has left the dist...
|
| Brian's Sister | Mentioned Person |
Mentioned by Ms. Menninger; Brian allegedly made statements inconsistent with hers.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Timeline (1 events)
August 10, 2022
Court hearing discussion regarding witness list and subpoenas.
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction from which Brian has departed.
|
Relationships (2)
Ms. Menninger refers to 'inconsistent statements with his sister'.
Menninger discusses keeping him under subpoena.
Key Quotes (4)
"The government has indicated they're not calling Brian."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013282.jpg
Quote #1
"He has a lot of prior inconsistent statements with his sister, your Honor."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013282.jpg
Quote #2
"We have him under subpoena."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013282.jpg
Quote #3
"Brian has left the district since he's no longer a government witness."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013282.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,437 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 4 of 262 1709
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
1 interview, not because we had some other contact with him.
2 THE COURT: So you have a choice to make whether to
3 subpoena him or not. I'm just trying to understand what the
4 decision point is. The government has indicated they're not
5 calling Brian.
6 MS. MENNINGER: He has a lot of prior inconsistent
7 statements with his sister, your Honor. That's the decision
8 point. He said a lot of things that are inconsistent in her
9 prior statements. We understand if we call him that your Honor
10 is likely to allow them to then bring in the prior consistent
11 statements that they would have elicited had they called him
12 yesterday. So that's a decision point.
13 THE COURT: Okay. You have a decision point whether
14 to call him?
15 MS. MENNINGER: Right.
16 THE COURT: Is there an application with respect to
17 it?
18 MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. We have him under
19 subpoena.
20 THE COURT: Mr. Rohrbach.
21 MR. ROHRBACH: I suppose we just flag that Brian has
22 left the district since he's no longer a government witness.
23 If the defense ends up deciding to call him, I suppose that's
24 their choice to make.
25 It sounds like the defense has not yet made a decision
2 THE COURT: So you have a choice to make whether to
3 subpoena him or not. I'm just trying to understand what the
4 decision point is. The government has indicated they're not
5 calling Brian.
6 MS. MENNINGER: He has a lot of prior inconsistent
7 statements with his sister, your Honor. That's the decision
8 point. He said a lot of things that are inconsistent in her
9 prior statements. We understand if we call him that your Honor
10 is likely to allow them to then bring in the prior consistent
11 statements that they would have elicited had they called him
12 yesterday. So that's a decision point.
13 THE COURT: Okay. You have a decision point whether
14 to call him?
15 MS. MENNINGER: Right.
16 THE COURT: Is there an application with respect to
17 it?
18 MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. We have him under
19 subpoena.
20 THE COURT: Mr. Rohrbach.
21 MR. ROHRBACH: I suppose we just flag that Brian has
22 left the district since he's no longer a government witness.
23 If the defense ends up deciding to call him, I suppose that's
24 their choice to make.
25 It sounds like the defense has not yet made a decision
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013282
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document