An email from attorney Susan Necheles dated March 13, 2020, sharing a draft legal submission via Google Docs. Necheles argues that her client (name redacted) was a 'cog in Epstein's wheel' who acted under his direction while being a 'vulnerable victim' herself, and suggests that a non-prosecution ('non-pros') disposition is appropriate.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Susan Necheles | Sender / Attorney |
Sending a draft factual statement via Google Docs on behalf of a client.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased Subject |
Referenced as the central figure ('Epstein's wheel'); the client is described as acting at his direction.
|
| [Redacted Female Client] | Client / Subject of Submission |
Described as a 'cog in Epstein's wheel', a 'vulnerable victim', and someone who acted entirely at Epstein's direction...
|
| [Redacted Recipients] | Recipients |
Likely prosecutors or legal adversaries being sent a draft statement to negotiate a non-prosecution agreement.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Google LLC |
Service provider for the document sharing.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address for Google LLC listed in the footer.
|
"We feel that given [Redacted] abuse, and given the fact that we see her basically as a cog in Epstein's wheel, acting entirely at his direction and doing what she did at a time that she herself was a very vulnerable victim, a non-pros would be the appropriate disposition."Source
"But we want to discuss this with you before we finalize this and make a submission."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,115 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document