EFTA00025185.pdf

36.7 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email / legal correspondence
File Size: 36.7 KB
Summary

An email from attorney Susan Necheles dated March 13, 2020, sharing a draft legal submission via Google Docs. Necheles argues that her client (name redacted) was a 'cog in Epstein's wheel' who acted under his direction while being a 'vulnerable victim' herself, and suggests that a non-prosecution ('non-pros') disposition is appropriate.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Susan Necheles Sender / Attorney
Sending a draft factual statement via Google Docs on behalf of a client.
Jeffrey Epstein Deceased Subject
Referenced as the central figure ('Epstein's wheel'); the client is described as acting at his direction.
[Redacted Female Client] Client / Subject of Submission
Described as a 'cog in Epstein's wheel', a 'vulnerable victim', and someone who acted entirely at Epstein's direction...
[Redacted Recipients] Recipients
Likely prosecutors or legal adversaries being sent a draft statement to negotiate a non-prosecution agreement.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Google LLC
Service provider for the document sharing.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Address for Google LLC listed in the footer.

Relationships (2)

Susan Necheles Attorney-Client [Redacted Female Client]
Necheles is sending a submission 'on behalf of' the redacted individual and arguing for her defense.
[Redacted Female Client] Associate / Alleged Victim Jeffrey Epstein
Described as a 'cog in Epstein's wheel' and 'acting entirely at his direction' while being a 'vulnerable victim'.

Key Quotes (2)

"We feel that given [Redacted] abuse, and given the fact that we see her basically as a cog in Epstein's wheel, acting entirely at his direction and doing what she did at a time that she herself was a very vulnerable victim, a non-pros would be the appropriate disposition."
Source
EFTA00025185.pdf
Quote #1
"But we want to discuss this with you before we finalize this and make a submission."
Source
EFTA00025185.pdf
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,115 characters)

From: "Susan Necheles (via Google Docs)" <[REDACTED]>
To: <[REDACTED]>
Cc: <[REDACTED]>, <[REDACTED]>, <[REDACTED]>, <[REDACTED]>, <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Submission on behalf of [REDACTED]
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:39:50 +0000
[REDACTED] has shared a link to the following document:
Submission on behalf of [REDACTED]
[Unk
nown
profile] [REDACTED] and [REDACTED],
Attached is a draft of the factual statement, just so that you can better understand the facts that we are presenting.
We feel that given [REDACTED] abuse, and given the fact that we see her basically as a cog in Epstein's wheel, acting entirely at his direction and doing what she did at a time that she herself was a very vulnerable victim, a non-pros would be the appropriate disposition. But we want to discuss this with you before we finalize this and make a submission.
Thanks, Susan
Open in Docs
Google Docs: Create and edit documents online.
Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
You have received this email because someone shared a document with you from Google Docs.
[Logo for Google Docs]
EFTA00025185

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document