This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on the mechanics of memory contamination, the difference between open-ended and leading questions, and the impact of stress on memory recall. The witness mentions previously consulting for the CIA regarding interviewing techniques.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Loftus | Witness/Expert |
Undergoing direct examination regarding memory and interviewing techniques (Likely Elizabeth Loftus based on context).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| CIA |
Mentioned by the witness as an organization where they lectured/consulted on interviewing techniques.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting firm listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, referenced in the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00016610.
|
"CIA, I would be talking about interviewing techniques and other sources of potential post-event information that can contaminate memory."Source
"it's certainly open-ended questions give you, in some sense, more accurate information."Source
"you would like to have them be as neutral as possible so that you don't contaminate the witness."Source
"when you talk about stress, it's usually at the time of the event itself."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,757 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document