DOJ-OGR-00016610.jpg

640 KB

Extraction Summary

1
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 640 KB
Summary

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on the mechanics of memory contamination, the difference between open-ended and leading questions, and the impact of stress on memory recall. The witness mentions previously consulting for the CIA regarding interviewing techniques.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Loftus Witness/Expert
Undergoing direct examination regarding memory and interviewing techniques (Likely Elizabeth Loftus based on context).

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
CIA
Mentioned by the witness as an organization where they lectured/consulted on interviewing techniques.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting firm listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice, referenced in the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00016610.

Timeline (2 events)

August 10, 2022
Filing date of the transcript document.
Court (Southern District of New York implied by Case ID)
Loftus Attorney (Q)
Unknown (Past)
Lectures/Consulting by Loftus
Unknown

Relationships (1)

Loftus Consultant/Lecturer CIA
Line 1-4: 'CIA, I would be talking about interviewing techniques... That's part of what those lectures and consulting is about.'

Key Quotes (4)

"CIA, I would be talking about interviewing techniques and other sources of potential post-event information that can contaminate memory."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016610.jpg
Quote #1
"it's certainly open-ended questions give you, in some sense, more accurate information."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016610.jpg
Quote #2
"you would like to have them be as neutral as possible so that you don't contaminate the witness."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016610.jpg
Quote #3
"when you talk about stress, it's usually at the time of the event itself."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016610.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,757 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 127 of 246 2422
LCGCmax4 Loftus - direct
1 CIA, I would be talking about interviewing techniques and other
2 sources of potential post-event information that can
3 contaminate memory. That's part of what those lectures and
4 consulting is about.
5 Q. And in connection with an interviewing process, would there
6 be a difference between asking what would be an open-ended
7 question where the person being questioned provides the
8 information as opposed to, as we all know, what a leading
9 question is where the information may be provided and the
10 recipient of the question just answers yes or no?
11 A. Well, it's certainly open-ended questions give you, in some
12 sense, more accurate information. It might not be fully
13 complete, so you might need to follow it up with some specific,
14 more specific information or the closed-ended questions, and
15 you would like to have them be as neutral as possible so that
16 you don't contaminate the witness. But to get a little bit
17 more complete a version of what you're looking for -- but when
18 you ask leading questions like how fast were the cars going
19 when they smashed into each other, that's probably not a good
20 way to follow up an open-ended question.
21 Q. Now, with regard to the process of questioning someone,
22 have you conducted any studies that show the impact of stress
23 in the interviewing environment?
24 A. I have -- no. Usually, when you talk about stress, it's
25 usually at the time of the event itself. It can be a very --
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016610

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document