DOJ-OGR-00019136.jpg
561 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
561 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between MS. MOE and THE COURT regarding the presentation of evidence, specifically the use of summary witnesses and exhibits under Rule 1006. MS. MOE seeks to publish exhibits efficiently for the jury, while the Court raises questions about the proposed method and its implications for witness involvement and evidence presentation.
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. |
Entity responsible for transcribing the court proceedings.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court discussion regarding the presentation of evidence and witnesses, specifically concerning summary witnesses and exhibits under Rule 1006. MS. MOE is arguing for a method of presenting exhibits to the jury without relying solely on lay witnesses, while the Court questions the approach.
A district court
Key Quotes (4)
"MS. MOE: I have in trials in this district called summary witnesses who helped publish and connect up facts across exhibits without creating summary charts under Rule 1006."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019136.jpg
Quote #1
"THE COURT: You're not offering him under 1006?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019136.jpg
Quote #2
"MS. MOE: We'd just like an opportunity to publish these exhibits in a way that facilitates the jury seeing them without doing this through lay witnesses where there are complications about reading things out loud, so that it's streamlined and efficient so the jury can see the evidence that's been admitted."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019136.jpg
Quote #3
"THE COURT: The one thing I've seen that it sounds like you're saying is actually not with a witness, but a bunch of documents come in, and then the government spends a little bit of time just publishing, publish this and publish that."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019136.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,393 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 49
LC9VMAXT
1985
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
I have in trials in this district called summary
witnesses who helped publish and connect up facts across
exhibits without creating summary charts under Rule 1006. I
think this testimony --
THE COURT: You're not offering him under 1006?
MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.
THE COURT: And he isn't involved in the
9
investigation.
10
MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.
11
We'd just like an opportunity to publish these
12
13
14
15
exhibits in a way that facilitates the jury seeing them without
doing this through lay witnesses where there are complications
about reading things out loud, so that it's streamlined and
efficient so the jury can see the evidence that's been
16
17
18
19
20
21
admitted. We think that's appropriate.
THE COURT: Why not just do it in closing?
MS. MOE: Your Honor, I think to rest our case and
have the jury not see some of the evidence in this case, our
preference would be --
THE COURT: The one thing I've seen that it sounds
22
23
like you're saying is actually not with a witness, but a bunch
of documents come in, and then the government spends a little
24
bit of time just publishing, publish this and publish that.
25
Again, I've never seen -- never seen -- an agent, a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00019136
LC9VMAXT
1985
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
I have in trials in this district called summary
witnesses who helped publish and connect up facts across
exhibits without creating summary charts under Rule 1006. I
think this testimony --
THE COURT: You're not offering him under 1006?
MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.
THE COURT: And he isn't involved in the
9
investigation.
10
MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.
11
We'd just like an opportunity to publish these
12
13
14
15
exhibits in a way that facilitates the jury seeing them without
doing this through lay witnesses where there are complications
about reading things out loud, so that it's streamlined and
efficient so the jury can see the evidence that's been
16
17
18
19
20
21
admitted. We think that's appropriate.
THE COURT: Why not just do it in closing?
MS. MOE: Your Honor, I think to rest our case and
have the jury not see some of the evidence in this case, our
preference would be --
THE COURT: The one thing I've seen that it sounds
22
23
like you're saying is actually not with a witness, but a bunch
of documents come in, and then the government spends a little
24
bit of time just publishing, publish this and publish that.
25
Again, I've never seen -- never seen -- an agent, a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00019136
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document