DOJ-OGR-00009049.jpg
464 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court brief
File Size:
464 KB
Summary
This document is page 48 of a legal filing (Document 613) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated February 24, 2022. The text argues that 'Juror No. 50' intentionally provided false answers on a jury selection questionnaire. It claims this intent is evidenced by the juror's post-verdict media appearances where he promoted himself and his status as a victim.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
Accused of providing intentional false answers on a questionnaire and engaging in post-verdict media promotion.
|
| Presiding Judge | Judge |
Mentioned in the context of giving legal instructions.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (1)
Juror No. 50 answered court questionnaires and served on the jury.
Key Quotes (4)
"The purpose of this questionnaire is to determine whether prospective jurors can decide this case impartially based upon the evidence presented at trial and the legal instructions given by the presiding judge."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009049.jpg
Quote #1
"Although some of the questions may appear to be of a personal nature, please understand that the Court and the parties must learn enough information about each juror’s background and experience to select a fair and impartial jury."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009049.jpg
Quote #2
"Fourth, Juror No. 50’s post-verdict conduct shows his false answers to the questionnaire were intentional."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009049.jpg
Quote #3
"Juror No. 50 went on a media press to promote himself, his experience as a victim, and his role on the jury."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009049.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (942 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 48 of 66
[REDACTED BLOCK]
Ex. 1, p 3 (“The purpose of this questionnaire is to determine
whether prospective jurors can decide this case impartially based upon the evidence
presented at trial and the legal instructions given by the presiding judge.”). The
questionnaire also told potential jurors that it would ask personal questions. Id.
(“Although some of the questions may appear to be of a personal nature, please
understand that the Court and the parties must learn enough information about each
juror’s background and experience to select a fair and impartial jury.”). [REDACTED BLOCK]
whether prospective jurors can decide this case impartially based upon the evidence
presented at trial and the legal instructions given by the presiding judge.”). The
questionnaire also told potential jurors that it would ask personal questions. Id.
(“Although some of the questions may appear to be of a personal nature, please
understand that the Court and the parties must learn enough information about each
juror’s background and experience to select a fair and impartial jury.”). [REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
Fourth, Juror No. 50’s post-verdict conduct shows his false answers to the
questionnaire were intentional. Juror No. 50 went on a media press to promote himself,
his experience as a victim, and his role on the jury. He has given multiple interviews to
questionnaire were intentional. Juror No. 50 went on a media press to promote himself,
his experience as a victim, and his role on the jury. He has given multiple interviews to
41
DOJ-OGR-00009049
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document