HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021370.jpg

2.55 MB

Extraction Summary

1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Academic/theological text (page from a book or manuscript)
File Size: 2.55 MB
Summary

This document appears to be Page 124 of a theological or philosophical book/manuscript discussing the concept of 'The Problem of Inattention' regarding Christian belief and the invisibility of God. The text explores the theological concept of 'double agency' and mentions the resurrection of Jesus. While the Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021370) indicates this document was part of a House Oversight Committee investigation (potentially related to the Epstein case given the user prompt context), this specific page contains no names, dates, or events directly linking to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or criminal activities.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Jesus Religious Figure
Mentioned in the context of the resurrection as an event without natural causes.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Referenced in the footer Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021370', indicating this document is part of a congressional in...

Timeline (1 events)

Biblical Era
Resurrection of Jesus
Unknown

Relationships (1)

Christians Religious/Theological God
Text discusses the relationship between Christians and God regarding 'inattention' and 'double agency'.

Key Quotes (3)

"The Christian who believes God is his or her creator is therefore confident that God continues to work for his or her ultimate good"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021370.jpg
Quote #1
"The invisibility of God that follows from a belief in the comprehensiveness of God’s influence simply means in that case that God drops out of sight and mind"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021370.jpg
Quote #2
"God hides behind, so to speak, all the creaturely influences that God is working through"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021370.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,483 characters)

Page | 124
parent from within the field of variously operative forces or influences on one’s life, and for that reason the Christian need neither fear God’s loss nor rue God’s absence as one would such a parent’s. Unlike relations with human others, which are situation-sensitive and thereby susceptible to change of character, rupture, and decline, God, Christians believe, is with one, whatever happens, in exactly the same capacity-- as the creator and sustainer of whatever it is that remains good about one’s life, be that only at a minimum the bare fact that one continues to live. The Christian who believes God is his or her creator is therefore confident that God continues to work for his or her ultimate good, that God is engaged in the effort to increase it, whatever the impediments in human life suggesting the contrary, absent, that is, almost any confirming evidence.
The Problem of Inattention
Although invisibility and apparent absence do not pose the same problem here as they do when God is one’s friend, this rather more impersonal understanding of God’s influence as creator and sustainer has its own problem maintaining a strong sense of connection to God. The diffuseness of influence that lies behind God’s constant invisible presence can prompt simple Christian inattention to God. The very monotony of the always pertinent Christian affirmation that everything is to be attributed to God can make that affirmation recede from focal awareness, make it fail to come focally to mind. Belief in God’s uniform presence would thereby become functionally indistinguishable from the sense of God’s absence. The invisibility of God that follows from a belief in the comprehensiveness of God’s influence simply means in that case that God drops out of sight and mind, drops out of Christian consideration for most intents and purposes, most of the time. Such a God has little to offer as a “para-social” entity, as a factor fomenting or supplementing a sense of social connection.
In the back of their minds Christians may believe that God is the source of everything, but they may not feel compelled to consider that fact actively in the course of their everyday lives. God hides behind, so to speak, all the creaturely influences that God is working through, which become matters of primary Christian preoccupation. At the center of attention are all the ordinary influences and connections with one’s natural and human environments; preoccupation with them pushes out of focal awareness the fact of God as the ultimate source of them all. Apart from specifically religious obligations—say, the demand to give God thanks and praise at times of worship—Christians who believe God is their creator would have no particular reason to dwell on that fact.
Christian theologians commonly tie this sort of practical worry--about what from a Christian point of view amounts to sinful neglect of one’s connection to God--to the understanding of double agency in the account of creation I sketched above.xv According to that account, it is true, God’s influence on human life does not have to go by way of the human and natural causal powers and influences on human life that God creates; God can influence human life without producing sufficient created causes for what God wants to happen in human life. (The Christian claim that Jesus was resurrected from the dead—an event without natural causes-- is a case in point, one that Christians are
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021370

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document