This document contains an email thread and a travel voucher notification from November 2019 regarding a trip to Santa Monica, CA, for a 'U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interview' (Case R20NYS13179). The emails discuss administrative issues, specifically a discrepancy in lodging costs ($248 vs $247) and the reimbursement of Transient Occupancy Tax charged by the Doubletree by Hilton, noting that LA County is tax-exempt. The traveler, referred to as 'Alex', traveled from November 13 to November 15, 2019.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alex | Traveler / Recipient |
Addressed in email regarding tax issues on hotel bill; likely the person who traveled for the witness interview.
|
| Travel Arranger | Administrative |
Prepared the voucher 10810414(1).
|
| Accounting Department representative | Finance/Admin |
Contacted the sender regarding transient occupancy tax.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Inferred from 'U.S. v. Epstein' case name and 'dojnet.doj.gov' URL.
|
|
| Doubletree by Hilton Santa Monica |
Hotel where the traveler stayed.
|
|
| CWT Sato Travel |
Travel service provider (etravelservices@cwtsatotravel.com).
|
|
| LA County |
Mentioned as tax exempt.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Destination of the trip.
|
"Purpose: R20NYS13179 - U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interview"Source
"Alex, an Accounting Department representative just contacted me regarding the transient occupancy tax you were charged for your stay at Doubletree by Hilton Santa Monica"Source
"LA County is tax exempt."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,983 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document