This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on February 24, 2022. It features the redirect examination of a witness named Brune, who is being questioned by the Judge about why his firm did not disclose knowledge regarding 'Juror No. 1.' Brune argues that the information was easily accessible via Google and assumed the government had also found it, specifically mentioning a letter the government received and a 'Westlaw report.'
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness/Attorney |
Testifying under redirect examination regarding knowledge of a juror's background.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Questioning the witness about disclosure of knowledge.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Subject of the discussion regarding background checks and Google searches.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
|
Referenced as the method used to search for juror information.
|
||
| Westlaw |
Mentioned in relation to a report on the juror.
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced as the opposing party in the legal argument.
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Department of Justice Office of Government Relations (indicated in footer stamp).
|
"But then how would the Court or the government have anticipated that your firm had knowledge about certain matters if you didn't disclose it?"Source
"And it was sort of lying there right on the surface, that if you Google it, it comes up."Source
"I really thought that the government had Googled too, and that we were in the same place with respect to Juror No. 1."Source
"I did not know about the Westlaw report at the"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,600 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document