DOJ-OGR-00014663.jpg

534 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 534 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Ms. Comey, and Mr. Pagliuca regarding how to respond to a jury question about an item labeled '3505-005'. The parties agree to send a note clarifying that 3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit but referring the jury to 'Carolyn's testimony' regarding it.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Comey Prosecutor/Attorney
Discussing jury instructions regarding exhibit 3505-005.
Mr. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Discussing jury instructions regarding exhibit 3505-005.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the discussion and drafting a note to the jury.
Carolyn Witness
Mentioned in relation to testimony given regarding exhibit 3505-005 (likely Carolyn typically associated with this ca...

Organizations (2)

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court proceeding/sidebar discussion regarding a jury note asking about exhibit 3505-005.
Southern District Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court (likely SDNY)

Relationships (2)

Ms. Comey Opposing Counsel Mr. Pagliuca
Debating the wording of the response to the jury.
Carolyn Testimonial Subject Exhibit 3505-005
Transcript mentions 'testimony regarding 3505-005 is in the transcript you have regarding Carolyn's testimony.'

Key Quotes (3)

"3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014663.jpg
Quote #1
"The testimony regarding 3505-005 is in the transcript you have regarding Carolyn's testimony."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014663.jpg
Quote #2
"I think sending in a note will save time, your Honor, and makes sense."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014663.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,395 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 5 of 19 3096
LCLVMAXT
1 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, what about "3505-005 is not an
2 admitted exhibit."
3 MR. PAGLIUCA: If the Court is considering that, I
4 think there needs to be a second sentence, which is, "The
5 testimony about 3505-005 has been provided in the transcript."
6 MS. COMEY: That's redundant, your Honor. They know
7 that; that's why they are asking the question. So I don't
8 think it's necessary.
9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, it can't really hurt if it's
10 redundant, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: That's true.
12 I'm just writing it out.
13 "3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit. The testimony
14 regarding 3505-005 is in the transcript you have regarding
15 Carolyn's testimony."
16 MR. PAGLIUCA: That's fine with us, your Honor.
17 MS. COMEY: Fine with us, your Honor. Thank you.
18 THE COURT: Okay. I'm happy to bring them out and do
19 it orally or send in a note for efficiency.
20 MS. COMEY: I think sending in a note will save time,
21 your Honor, and makes sense.
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: We agree.
23 THE COURT: Okay. So let me just be clear.
24 I'm going to say: I received your note regarding --
25 I'll just say regarding 3505-005. 3505-005 is not an admitted
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014663

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document