DOJ-OGR-00016366.jpg
474 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
474 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger is cross-examining witness A. Farmer regarding potential inconsistencies between her testimony about being nude during a massage and statements she made to Mr. Baker of The New York Times. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) objects to the line of questioning, and the Judge sustains the objection, ruling it is not a prior inconsistent statement.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| A. Farmer | Witness |
Under cross-examination; testifying about a massage.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Conducting cross-examination of A. Farmer; questioning consistency of statements.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Prosecutor |
Objecting to Menninger's line of questioning.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the trial, ruling on objections.
|
| Mr. Baker | Journalist |
Mentioned as a reporter from The New York Times who spoke with the witness.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The New York Times |
Media organization employing Mr. Baker.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00016366).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely SDNY (Southern District of New York) based on court reporters.
|
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,073 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 150 of 267 2178
LCAVMAX6 A. Farmer - cross
LCAVMAX6 A. Farmer - cross
1 BY MS. MENNINGER:
2 Q. If I could direct your attention to the paragraph that's
3 third from the bottom, begins with I.
4 A. Yes.
5 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, objection.
6 This is not inconsistent.
7 MS. MENNINGER: What? I can't hear.
8 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.
9 THE COURT: All right. Just a minute.
10 Let me read it.
11 Sustained.
12 MS. MENNINGER: I did not hear the basis for the
13 objection, your Honor.
14 THE COURT: Not a prior inconsistent statement. I've
15 ruled, Ms. Menninger. Sustained.
16 MS. MENNINGER: I'm not allowed to ask about this
17 document at all?
18 THE COURT: You can ask the next question, but what
19 you just drew to I've sustained.
20 BY MS. MENNINGER:
21 Q. I draw your attention to the second paragraph from the top.
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And while you testified on direct that you had nothing on
24 during the massage, what you told Mr. Baker from The New York
25 Times --
2 Q. If I could direct your attention to the paragraph that's
3 third from the bottom, begins with I.
4 A. Yes.
5 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, objection.
6 This is not inconsistent.
7 MS. MENNINGER: What? I can't hear.
8 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.
9 THE COURT: All right. Just a minute.
10 Let me read it.
11 Sustained.
12 MS. MENNINGER: I did not hear the basis for the
13 objection, your Honor.
14 THE COURT: Not a prior inconsistent statement. I've
15 ruled, Ms. Menninger. Sustained.
16 MS. MENNINGER: I'm not allowed to ask about this
17 document at all?
18 THE COURT: You can ask the next question, but what
19 you just drew to I've sustained.
20 BY MS. MENNINGER:
21 Q. I draw your attention to the second paragraph from the top.
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And while you testified on direct that you had nothing on
24 during the massage, what you told Mr. Baker from The New York
25 Times --
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016366
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document