DOJ-OGR-00014700.jpg
576 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
576 KB
Summary
This is page 14 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The transcript captures a debate between the defense (Mr. Everdell), the prosecution (Ms. Moe), and the Court regarding how to answer a jury note concerning 'Count Four' and a 'second element' related to specific flights or trips. The Judge leans toward following the government's suggestion to refer the jury back to the original instructions rather than providing new specifics.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding jury instructions.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Advocating for referring the jury to specific lines (Page 28, instruction 21).
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor |
Objecting to Everdell's suggestion; arguing the jury's question refers to Count Four generally.
|
| The Jury | Jurors |
Sent a note asking for clarification on Count Four and the second element.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced by the Court ('follow the government's suggestion').
|
|
| DOJ |
referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR-00014700
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
SDNY (implied by Southern District Reporters)
|
Relationships (1)
Debating how to respond to the jury note.
Key Quotes (4)
"We can't tell which flight we're talking about, which leg of a potentially multi-leg trip we're talking about."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014700.jpg
Quote #1
"I think the proper course here is to refer the jury to the particulars with respect to this element."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014700.jpg
Quote #2
"I am inclined to follow the government's suggestion here and to say, I can't provide an additional response to your question other than to consider carefully the instructions"Source
DOJ-OGR-00014700.jpg
Quote #3
"Your Honor, those particular lines don't appear to be what the jury is asking about."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014700.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,470 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 14 of 29 3131
LCRVMAXT
LCRVMAXT
1 We can't tell which flight we're talking about, which
2 leg of a potentially multi-leg trip we're talking about. And
3 so I think here, again, the Court gave a thorough instruction
4 about this particular element. Because we can't tell which set
5 of facts they are asking about, I think the proper course here
6 is to refer the jury to the particulars with respect to this
7 element.
8 THE COURT: It's difficult to know and to have in my
9 head, based on the articulation of the question, as well as the
10 testimony, exactly what they are referring to. I don't know.
11 So I am inclined to follow the government's suggestion
12 here and to say, I can't provide an additional response to your
13 question other than to consider carefully the instructions as
14 to -- I mean, I could either point them to all of the count or
15 specifically to the second element, since that's what they're
16 asking about.
17 MR. EVERDELL: If we're going to just refer them to
18 certain language, I think we refer them to the language in the
19 last paragraph.
20 THE COURT: Page?
21 MR. EVERDELL: Page 28, instruction number 21, lines
22 14 through 17.
23 MS. MOE: Your Honor, those particular lines don't
24 appear to be what the jury is asking about. I recognize that
25 the note refers to Count Four and the second element, but the
2 leg of a potentially multi-leg trip we're talking about. And
3 so I think here, again, the Court gave a thorough instruction
4 about this particular element. Because we can't tell which set
5 of facts they are asking about, I think the proper course here
6 is to refer the jury to the particulars with respect to this
7 element.
8 THE COURT: It's difficult to know and to have in my
9 head, based on the articulation of the question, as well as the
10 testimony, exactly what they are referring to. I don't know.
11 So I am inclined to follow the government's suggestion
12 here and to say, I can't provide an additional response to your
13 question other than to consider carefully the instructions as
14 to -- I mean, I could either point them to all of the count or
15 specifically to the second element, since that's what they're
16 asking about.
17 MR. EVERDELL: If we're going to just refer them to
18 certain language, I think we refer them to the language in the
19 last paragraph.
20 THE COURT: Page?
21 MR. EVERDELL: Page 28, instruction number 21, lines
22 14 through 17.
23 MS. MOE: Your Honor, those particular lines don't
24 appear to be what the jury is asking about. I recognize that
25 the note refers to Count Four and the second element, but the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014700
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document