DOJ-OGR-00008972.jpg
475 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order
File Size:
475 KB
Summary
This is a court order filed on February 18, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses proposed redactions to the Defendant's motion for a new trial, rejecting specific redaction requests because the information constitutes legal arguments or is widely reported in the press. The document specifically lists page and line numbers in the Defense Brief where redactions were denied.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | District Judge |
Judge issuing the order regarding redactions in the Maxwell case.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the criminal case; submitted motion for new trial and proposed redactions.
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Mentioned in relation to a motion where no redactions were proposed.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Court where the case is being heard.
|
|
| United States of America |
Government entity prosecuting the case.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court.
|
Relationships (2)
Case caption: United States of America -v- Ghislaine Maxwell
Judge presiding over Defendant's case
Key Quotes (1)
"The Court determines that the following proposed redactions are not consistent with the Court’s prior order... because they redact information that is widely reported in the press and/or redact legal arguments"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008972.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,175 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 605 Filed 02/18/22 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 2/18/22
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 2/18/22
United States of America,
–v–
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
20-CR-330 (AJN)
ORDER
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of the parties’ proposed redactions to the Defendant’s motion for a
new trial, the Government’s response in opposition, and the Defendant’s reply in support. See
Dkt. No. 596. The parties did not propose any redactions to Juror 50’s motion nor the parties
letters dated January 13, 2022. See id. at 7. The Defendant submitted a letter justifying her
proposed redactions, Dkt. No. 602, and the Government submitted an opposition to the
proposals, Dkt. No. 603.
new trial, the Government’s response in opposition, and the Defendant’s reply in support. See
Dkt. No. 596. The parties did not propose any redactions to Juror 50’s motion nor the parties
letters dated January 13, 2022. See id. at 7. The Defendant submitted a letter justifying her
proposed redactions, Dkt. No. 602, and the Government submitted an opposition to the
proposals, Dkt. No. 603.
The Court determines that the following proposed redactions are not consistent with the
Court’s prior order, Dkt. No. 596, because they redact information that is widely reported in the
press and/or redact legal arguments:
Court’s prior order, Dkt. No. 596, because they redact information that is widely reported in the
press and/or redact legal arguments:
• Defense Br. at:
o ii, lines 17-18;
o 21, lines 1-2;
o 49, lines 16-21;
o 51, lines 10-16;
o 57, lines 5-7
• Gov. Resp. at:
1
DOJ-OGR-00008972
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document