DOJ-OGR-00008412.jpg
539 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
539 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on December 17, 2021, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Judge discusses procedural matters regarding background information for the jury and addresses 'No. 6, evidence that goes to consent issues.' Attorneys Ms. Moe (Government) and Christian Everdell (Defense) are present, and the court suggests deferring the consent argument to the discussion of the Rule 412 motion due to overlapping issues.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Government Attorney (Prosecution) |
Responding to the judge regarding guidance offered; agrees with the court regarding the 412 motion overlap.
|
| Christian Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Counsel for the defense; confirms he has no questions regarding the court's guidance at that time.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, providing guidance on jury instructions and evidence admissibility.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in footer
|
|
| The Government |
Represented by Ms. Moe
|
|
| DOJ |
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-12-17
Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent and Rule 412.
Southern District of New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by Southern District Reporters and case number
|
Relationships (2)
MS. MOE: Not from the government, your Honor.
Defense counsel responding to the court.
Key Quotes (4)
"At base, the Court encourages the parties to confer on appropriate process for putting background information in front of the jury"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008412.jpg
Quote #1
"No. 6, evidence that goes to consent issues."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008412.jpg
Quote #2
"The government requests to exclude evidence or argument regarding consent."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008412.jpg
Quote #3
"it seems to me the issues implicated in this motion overlap, at least potentially, to the issues raised and to be discussed in the 412 motion"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008412.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,314 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 549-1 Filed 12/17/21 Page 18 of 24 30
LB15MAX2
LB15MAX2
1 counsel made only a good faith -- actually, I will retract that
2 last sentence.
3 At base, the Court encourages the parties to confer on
4 appropriate process for putting background information in front
5 of the jury, as necessary, to allow the kinds of
6 cross-examination that would be permissible and required under
7 the relevant law.
8 Let me pause and ask counsel if they have any
9 questions with respect to the guidance I have offered at this
10 time. Obviously there may be issues we will need to take up as
11 we go.
12 Ms. Moe?
13 MS. MOE: Not from the government, your Honor. Thank
14 you.
15 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, Christian Everdell.
16 Not at this time, your Honor.
17 THE COURT: Thank you.
18 No. 6, evidence that goes to consent issues.
19 The government requests to exclude evidence or
20 argument regarding consent. Now let me ask counsel, it seems
21 to me the issues implicated in this motion overlap, at least
22 potentially, to the issues raised and to be discussed in the
23 412 motion and I am wondering if we should at least begin by
24 taking it up at that time, as necessary.
25 MS. MOE: Your Honor, the government agrees that makes
2 last sentence.
3 At base, the Court encourages the parties to confer on
4 appropriate process for putting background information in front
5 of the jury, as necessary, to allow the kinds of
6 cross-examination that would be permissible and required under
7 the relevant law.
8 Let me pause and ask counsel if they have any
9 questions with respect to the guidance I have offered at this
10 time. Obviously there may be issues we will need to take up as
11 we go.
12 Ms. Moe?
13 MS. MOE: Not from the government, your Honor. Thank
14 you.
15 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, Christian Everdell.
16 Not at this time, your Honor.
17 THE COURT: Thank you.
18 No. 6, evidence that goes to consent issues.
19 The government requests to exclude evidence or
20 argument regarding consent. Now let me ask counsel, it seems
21 to me the issues implicated in this motion overlap, at least
22 potentially, to the issues raised and to be discussed in the
23 412 motion and I am wondering if we should at least begin by
24 taking it up at that time, as necessary.
25 MS. MOE: Your Honor, the government agrees that makes
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00008412
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document