DOJ-OGR-00010322.jpg
530 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / government letter
File Size:
530 KB
Summary
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Vernon S. Broderick dated April 1, 2022, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government opposes the defendant's request to stay proceedings based on a Paramount Plus trailer featuring an interview with Juror 50, arguing the request is speculative and that the Court has already conducted a thorough fact-finding hearing regarding the juror.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Vernon S. Broderick | Judge |
Recipient of the letter; United States District Court Judge.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
The defendant in Case S2 20 Cr. 330, seeking a stay of proceedings.
|
| Juror 50 | Juror / Interview Subject |
A juror from the trial whose unreleased interview with Paramount Plus is the subject of the defendant's motion.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Justice |
Sender of the letter.
|
|
| United States Attorney Southern District of New York |
Specific office submitting the letter.
|
|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Venue of the case.
|
|
| Paramount Plus |
Released a trailer for an interview with Juror 50.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the U.S. Attorney's Office.
|
|
|
Address of Judge Broderick.
|
Relationships (2)
Letter discusses motion regarding Juror 50's potential bias or statements.
Reference to an unreleased interview and trailer.
Key Quotes (4)
"The Government respectfully submits this letter in opposition to the defendant’s April 1, 2022 letter, which requests a stay of this matter based on a Paramount Plus trailer."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010322.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court should reject the defendant’s application, which is premised on the pure speculation that an unreleased interview with Juror 50 could potentially contain information relevant to the defendant’s motion."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010322.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court has conducted a thorough hearing, at which the Court asked Juror 50 detailed questions about all subjects relevant to the pending motion."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010322.jpg
Quote #3
"The Court has completed the fact-finding process, and there is no basis on the current record to conclude that a stay is warranted."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010322.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,376 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 652 Filed 04/01/22 Page 1 of 2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
April 1, 2022
By ECF
The Honorable Vernon S. Broderick
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007B
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007B
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (VSB)
Dear Judge Broderick:
The Government respectfully submits this letter in opposition to the defendant’s April 1,
2022 letter, which requests a stay of this matter based on a Paramount Plus trailer. The Court
should reject the defendant’s application, which is premised on the pure speculation that an
unreleased interview with Juror 50 could potentially contain information relevant to the
defendant’s motion.
2022 letter, which requests a stay of this matter based on a Paramount Plus trailer. The Court
should reject the defendant’s application, which is premised on the pure speculation that an
unreleased interview with Juror 50 could potentially contain information relevant to the
defendant’s motion.
The Court has conducted a thorough hearing, at which the Court asked Juror 50 detailed
questions about all subjects relevant to the pending motion. The Court has completed the fact-
finding process, and there is no basis on the current record to conclude that a stay is warranted.
Indeed, the defendant’s application contains no legal or factual support beyond the citation to a
Paramount Plus trailer. If the defendant obtains new information, she may file any appropriate
questions about all subjects relevant to the pending motion. The Court has completed the fact-
finding process, and there is no basis on the current record to conclude that a stay is warranted.
Indeed, the defendant’s application contains no legal or factual support beyond the citation to a
Paramount Plus trailer. If the defendant obtains new information, she may file any appropriate
1
DOJ-OGR-00010322
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document