DOJ-OGR-00017630.jpg

554 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 554 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details a discussion between attorneys (Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger) and the Court regarding the admissibility of internet materials, specifically Wikipedia pages and tabloid articles, as evidence before a jury. Ms. Menninger argues she is providing materials in advance to expedite proceedings, while Ms. Moe objects to their nature.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Attorney (Likely Prosecution)
Arguing against the admissibility of internet printouts, Wikipedia pages, and tabloid articles as evidence.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, asking clarifying questions about the objection to internet materials.
Ms. Menninger Attorney (Defense)
Laura Menninger (implied); stating she is trying to provide materials in advance to speed up proceedings.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Wikipedia
Mentioned as an example of inadmissible evidence.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding evidentiary objections in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Southern District of New York

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case context.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Moe Legal Professional The Court
Dialogue in transcript (Attorney to Judge).
Ms. Menninger Opposing Counsel Ms. Moe
Context of arguing for/against evidence admissibility.

Key Quotes (4)

"things like tabloid articles, Wikipedia pages, we don't think are appropriate as exhibits before the jury"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017630.jpg
Quote #1
"what's the grounds for a blanket objection to internet material?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017630.jpg
Quote #2
"We mostly just wanted to give the Court a preview of those issues that we anticipate arising."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017630.jpg
Quote #3
"I feel like I'm trying to give them stuff in advance so they can be prepared"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017630.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,367 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 21 of 264 427
LC1VMAX1
1 that regard that we can --
2 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
3 I think materials like printouts from the internet,
4 things like tabloid articles, Wikipedia pages, we don't think
5 are appropriate as exhibits before the jury, and so we would
6 object to exhibits of that nature.
7 In addition, the samples that we've been provided
8 include --
9 THE COURT: Doesn't it depend what it's being used --
10 you have an internet objection, is that the -- what's the
11 grounds for a blanket objection to internet material?
12 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
13 I agree that we'll have to take these as they come.
14 Thinking ahead, we can't conceive of a basis for offering
15 things like Wikipedia articles with this witness or tabloid
16 articles with this witness, but we recognize the Court will
17 have to address that as it comes because we're not quite sure
18 what the defense argument would be. We mostly just wanted to
19 give the Court a preview of those issues that we anticipate
20 arising.
21 THE COURT: Okay.
22 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I feel like I'm trying to
23 give them stuff in advance so they can be prepared and we can
24 move this proceeding more quickly, but it will only come up
25 when and if it comes up.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017630

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document