HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013720.jpg

2.03 MB

Extraction Summary

13
People
0
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Scientific / academic paper (page 220)
File Size: 2.03 MB
Summary

This document is a single page (p. 220) from a scientific text discussing chaos theory, specifically algorithmic strategies for computing Lyapounov exponents in relation to neurobiological data. It cites numerous researchers (Wolf, Sano, Eckmann, etc.) and discusses mathematical concepts like the Rössler and Lorenz butterfly attractors. While it bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013720' stamp indicating it is part of a congressional document production (likely related to the Epstein investigation given the context of his interest in science funding), the text itself is purely academic and mentions no specific individuals, locations, or events directly connected to Epstein's criminal activities.

People (13)

Name Role Context
Wolf Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Wolf et al, 1985)
Sano Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Sano and Sawaka, 1985)
Sawaka Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Sano and Sawaka, 1985)
Eckmann Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Eckmann et al, 1986)
Geist Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Geist et al, 1990)
Sato Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Sato et al, 1987)
Buzug Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Buzug et al, 1990)
Briggs Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Briggs, 1990)
Brown Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Brown et al, 1991)
Bryant Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Bryant et al, 1991)
Stoop Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Stoop and Parisi, 1991)
Parisi Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Stoop and Parisi, 1991)
Parlitz Researcher/Author
Cited in text (Parlitz, 1992)

Relationships (2)

Sano Academic Co-authors Sawaka
Cited as (Sano and Sawaka, 1985)
Stoop Academic Co-authors Parisi
Cited as (Stoop and Parisi, 1991)

Key Quotes (2)

"The number and variety of algorithmic strategies for computing Lyapounov exponents that are applicable to real data divide naturally into those that compute directly the average rate of separation of neighboring points from the "fiduciary" orbit..."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013720.jpg
Quote #1
"This "nonuniformity" in the rates of expansion and contraction in the dynamics over the attractor... becomes a useful tool in characterizing individual differences in sets of neurobiological data"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013720.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,455 characters)

The number and variety of algorithmic strategies for computing Lyapounov exponents that are applicable to real data divide naturally into those that compute directly the average rate of separation of neighboring points from the "fiduciary" orbit, as observed on the reconstructed attractor, from which only the largest λ can be obtained (Wolf et al, 1985), and a variety of techniques based on assumed model maps of the unknown flow along which the sequential products of the local derivatives are computed. The logarithms of the straight line slopes of the sequence of directionally decomposed local tangent vectors multiplied, yield as many Lyapounov exponents as directions (Sano and Sawaka, 1985; Eckmann et al, 1986; Geist et al, 1990). The techniques of regularization by which these model processes approximate the unknown flow include those with least squares, linear fit assumptions (Eckmann et al, 1986; Sato et al, 1987; Buzug et al, 1990), more detailed fits involving polynomial expressions in higher powers (Briggs, 1990; Brown et al, 1991; Bryant et al, 1991) and techniques such as "singular value decomposition" which decomposes the flow into orthogonal components before computing the logarithmic rate of divergence of nearby points on each of them (Stoop and Parisi, 1991). A clever check on the Lyapounov number obtained is to study the flow backwards so that, for example, some rate of separation of points in the forward direction would approximate the rate of convergence in the time reversed data (Parlitz, 1992).
Among the sources of spurious Lyapounov exponents are sample lengths that are too short and/or too measurement-noisy to compute a statistically stable average, embedding dimensions that are too high or low and attractors (many of physiological relevance) that have geometric features such as sharp corners or tight folds as in the Rössler (where points gather) or delicate boundary points such as those on the body on the Lorenz butterfly (see above) where very small distances determine whether the orbit makes big jumps to the right or left wing leading to uncharacteristically large separations. This "nonuniformity" in the rates of expansion and contraction in the dynamics over the attractor, a source of error in computations of statistical indices of the average behavior, becomes a useful tool in characterizing individual differences in sets of neurobiological data ranging from
220
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013720

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document