DOJ-OGR-00014966.jpg

597 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (direct examination)
File Size: 597 KB
Summary

This document is page 90 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. It features direct examination testimony from a witness named Rocchio regarding forensic psychology practices, specifically concerning the evaluation of adults disclosing childhood sexual abuse and issues surrounding statutes of limitations. The witness describes the process of determining when a patient became aware of the connection between current difficulties and past abuse.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Rocchio Witness/Expert
Providing direct testimony regarding forensic psychology practices and delayed disclosure of abuse.
Unnamed Attorney (Q) Examiner
Conducting direct examination of the witness.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp prefix DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

2025-01-15
Filing date of the court transcript document.
Southern District of New York (implied by case number/reporters)

Relationships (1)

Rocchio Witness/Examiner Unnamed Attorney
Q and A format in transcript header 'Rocchio - Direct'

Key Quotes (2)

"Disclosure-related issues in a forensic setting can come up particularly, for example, when there are issues related to the statute of limitations."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014966.jpg
Quote #1
"I was asked to evaluate the time at which an individual reasonably came to be aware of a connection between their present difficulties or potential connection between their present difficulties and the alleged abuse."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014966.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,530 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 90 of 158 90
LBAAMAX3ps Rocchio - Direct
1 evaluate patients who have delayed disclosing childhood sexual
2 abuse?
3 A. It's consistent with my peers and reports that I've read in
4 the clinical literature, yes.
5 Q. In your forensic practice, have you dealt with
6 disclosure-related issues?
7 A. I have.
8 Q. Can you explain.
9 A. Disclosure-related issues in a forensic setting can come up
10 particularly, for example, when there are issues related to the
11 statute of limitations. So in a recent case, I was asked to
12 evaluate the time at which an individual reasonably came to be
13 aware of a connection between their present difficulties or
14 potential connection between their present difficulties and the
15 alleged abuse. And part of that case involved my looking at,
16 you know, were there any reports made about the abuse at the
17 time, because I'm working with an adult who's alleging
18 something during childhood, and if so to whom and under what
19 circumstances. And, you know, even if the reports weren't made
20 at the time of the abuse, for example, did this person talk
21 about their experiences with their therapist or when they were
22 hospitalized for substance abuse, what did they have to say.
23 So I'm looking at what they disclosed, how they
24 disclosed it. I'm obviously, in a forensic setting, comparing
25 that to what they're telling me now and with what the fact
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014966

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document