DOJ-OGR-00016614.jpg

506 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (us district court)
File Size: 506 KB
Summary

This document is page 131 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Dr. Elizabeth Loftus) by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim. The testimony focuses on the concepts of the 'forgetting curve' and 'post-event information,' with several objections raised by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz regarding leading questions and witness commentary.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Loftus Witness
Expert witness testifying on direct examination regarding memory and the 'forgetting curve'.
Ms. Sternheim Defense Attorney
Conducting the direct examination of the witness.
Ms. Pomerantz Prosecutor
Raising objections during the examination.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the trial, ruling on objections, and instructing the jury.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Producer of the transcript.
DOJ
Identifier in the footer stamp (DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court testimony of witness Loftus regarding memory science.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the case number suffix (PAE) and the reporter's name.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Sternheim Attorney-Witness Loftus
Sternheim is conducting the direct examination of Loftus.
Ms. Pomerantz Opposing Counsel Ms. Sternheim
Pomerantz objects to Sternheim's questioning techniques (Leading).

Key Quotes (4)

"Are you familiar with the term forgetting curve?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016614.jpg
Quote #1
"I hope in talking about the forgetting curve I'm not violating any judge's order"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016614.jpg
Quote #2
"Jury will disregard the witness's last comment."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016614.jpg
Quote #3
"Well, post-event information is sort of an umbrella term."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016614.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,195 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 131 of 246 2426
LCGCmax4 Loftus - direct
1 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
2 THE COURT: Grounds.
3 MS. POMERANTZ: Leading.
4 THE COURT: Sustained.
5 MS. STERNHEIM: Okay. I'll move on.
6 BY MS. STERNHEIM:
7 Q. Are you familiar with the term forgetting curve?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Could you please explain to the jury what that means.
10 A. Yes. I hope in talking about the forgetting curve I'm not
11 violating any judge's order, but I will --
12 THE COURT: Jury will disregard the witness's last
13 comment. The witness will just direct her answers to the
14 questions posed. Thank you.
15 THE WITNESS: Okay. Sorry, your Honor.
16 Q. So the forgetting --
17 A. So the forgetting curve. If I were to plot how good is
18 memory as a function of how much time has passed --
19 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
20 THE COURT: Sustained.
21 MS. STERNHEIM: We'll move on.
22 Q. Going back again to the concept of post-event information,
23 you spoke before about post-event suggestion. What would that
24 be?
25 A. Well, post-event information is sort of an umbrella term.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016614

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document