This document is a page from a court transcript in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Judge rules that the government cannot use a witness with no personal experience to present a 'streamlined version of the closing argument,' distinguishing this from a Rule 1006 data summary. The parties also discuss the timing of a ruling on 'Exhibit 52' relative to when the government rests its case.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on evidentiary procedures regarding witness testimony and closing arguments.
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor (Government) |
Acknowledging the court's ruling regarding the streamlined version of the closing argument.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Raising the issue of Exhibit 52 and confirming the defense has no other issues.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor (Government) |
Confirming the timing regarding when the government is prepared to rest.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government | ||
| The Defense |
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on case number and reporter details.
|
"I'm not going to let you do it through a witness who has no personal experience. I think you do it in closing."Source
"That's what this is, it's closing argument."Source
"I think the only open issue that I'm aware of, your Honor, is the Exhibit 52 issue."Source
"I think we don't need it till the government is prepared to rest; is that right?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,698 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document