EFTA00023211.pdf
86.8 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order
File Size:
86.8 KB
Summary
A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 25, 2021. The order sets deadlines for responses and replies regarding motions in limine filed on October 18, requiring parties to file omnibus (single document) responses. It also establishes a protocol and deadline (October 29, 2021) for filing redacted briefs and a joint letter justifying those redactions.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | District Judge |
Judge issuing the order regarding filing deadlines and procedures.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Defendant in the criminal case 20-CR-330.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Court where the case is being heard.
|
|
| United States of America |
Plaintiff/Prosecution in the case.
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Appellate court mentioned in case citation.
|
Timeline (4 events)
2021-10-29
Deadline to file public docket briefing with proposed redactions and joint letter.
USDC SDNY
Government
Ghislaine Maxwell
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the court and where the order was signed.
|
Relationships (1)
Defendant vs Plaintiff in criminal case 20-CR-330.
Key Quotes (3)
"Each sides’ responses and any replies must be filed as a single document."Source
EFTA00023211.pdf
Quote #1
"The parties are ORDERED to file on the public docket all briefing with both parties’ proposed redactions, and a joint letter justifying any requested redactions by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga"Source
EFTA00023211.pdf
Quote #2
"Government should file an omnibus response brief to all of the motions in limine filed by the Defendant"Source
EFTA00023211.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,847 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 368 Filed 10/25/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 10/25/21
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 10/25/21
United States of America,
—v—
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
20-CR-330 (AJN)
ORDER
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
On October 18, 2021, the parties filed their respective motions in limine. Dkt. Nos. 355,
357, 358. Responses are due today, October 25, 2021. The parties are further ORDERED that
reply briefs, if any, are due by October 27, 2021. Each sides’ responses and any replies must be
filed as a single document. For example, the Government should file an omnibus response brief
to all of the motions in limine filed by the Defendant, and the Defendant should file an omnibus
response brief to the Government’s omnibus motion in limine. Similarly, any reply by the
Defendant should be an omnibus reply document and same for the Government.
357, 358. Responses are due today, October 25, 2021. The parties are further ORDERED that
reply briefs, if any, are due by October 27, 2021. Each sides’ responses and any replies must be
filed as a single document. For example, the Government should file an omnibus response brief
to all of the motions in limine filed by the Defendant, and the Defendant should file an omnibus
response brief to the Government’s omnibus motion in limine. Similarly, any reply by the
Defendant should be an omnibus reply document and same for the Government.
The parties filed their motions in limine temporarily under seal to allow for the other
side’s proposal and the Court’s consideration of redactions. See Dkt. Nos. 358-59. Each side
should consider the other party’s briefs—including any responses filed on October 25, and any
replies filed on October 27—and indicate whether they seek any additional redaction requests.
The parties are ORDERED to file on the public docket all briefing with both parties’ proposed
redactions, and a joint letter justifying any requested redactions by reference to the three-part test
articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir.
2006), on or before October 29, 2021.
side’s proposal and the Court’s consideration of redactions. See Dkt. Nos. 358-59. Each side
should consider the other party’s briefs—including any responses filed on October 25, and any
replies filed on October 27—and indicate whether they seek any additional redaction requests.
The parties are ORDERED to file on the public docket all briefing with both parties’ proposed
redactions, and a joint letter justifying any requested redactions by reference to the three-part test
articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir.
2006), on or before October 29, 2021.
SO ORDERED.
1
EFTA00023211
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 368 Filed 10/25/21 Page 2 of 2
Dated: October 25, 2021
New York, New York
Dated: October 25, 2021
New York, New York
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
United States District Judge
2
EFTA00023212
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document