DOJ-OGR-00016885.jpg
566 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
566 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell is addressing the Court regarding the timeline of the defendant's residence at a property on Kinnerton Street in London. Everdell argues that despite a deposition statement where the defendant claimed to be there in 1992 or 1993, she did not own or reside at the property at that time, noting that another couple lived there prior to her purchase.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Speaking to the court regarding witness testimony and the defendant's residence history.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion and questioning Mr. Everdell.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) |
Referred to as 'she' and 'the defendant'; discussion concerns her residence in London in '92/'93.
|
| Unnamed Couple | Previous Tenants/Owners |
Described as 'another couple that was in that house living there' before the defendant purchased it.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Prosecution; raised the deposition transcript issue.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
City where the defendant had residences.
|
|
|
Specific property in London; subject of dispute regarding when the defendant lived there.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction implied by the court reporter's name (Southern District of New York).
|
Relationships (1)
Everdell argues on behalf of 'she' (the defendant) and uses 'we' to refer to the defense team.
Key Quotes (3)
"'92, '93 was when I was there."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016885.jpg
Quote #1
"She had another residence in London prior to the Kinnerton Street residence."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016885.jpg
Quote #2
"There was another couple that was in that house living there until she owned it, purchased it, and then owned it, and then moved in."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016885.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,425 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 156 of 197 2697
LCHCmax5
LCHCmax5
1 correct?
2 MR. EVERDELL: That's right, your Honor.
3 THE COURT: You didn't see a need to find other
4 witnesses regarding --
5 MR. EVERDELL: And the reason why we had to is because
6 that is what we were planning to do all along, to show when she
7 was at that place.
8 However, when we litigated this issue and discussed it
9 yesterday, the Court -- the government raised the deposition
10 transcript from the defendant who said, in sort of an offhand
11 way, if you read the transcript, '92, '93 was when I was there.
12 Then it became an issue of when she was actually residing there
13 as opposed to when she owned it. We thought if the stipulation
14 was going to have to involve that testimony, as well, we then
15 now needed a witness, because the facts we believe to be true
16 was that she was not only -- did not own it until then, she was
17 not there, she did not reside there, she wasn't renting it.
18 There was another couple that was in that house living there
19 until she owned it, purchased it, and then owned it, and then
20 moved in.
21 THE COURT: So really, this is a new -- let me see if
22 I get this right.
23 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, if I can add one more
24 thing. She had another residence in London prior to the
25 Kinnerton Street residence.
2 MR. EVERDELL: That's right, your Honor.
3 THE COURT: You didn't see a need to find other
4 witnesses regarding --
5 MR. EVERDELL: And the reason why we had to is because
6 that is what we were planning to do all along, to show when she
7 was at that place.
8 However, when we litigated this issue and discussed it
9 yesterday, the Court -- the government raised the deposition
10 transcript from the defendant who said, in sort of an offhand
11 way, if you read the transcript, '92, '93 was when I was there.
12 Then it became an issue of when she was actually residing there
13 as opposed to when she owned it. We thought if the stipulation
14 was going to have to involve that testimony, as well, we then
15 now needed a witness, because the facts we believe to be true
16 was that she was not only -- did not own it until then, she was
17 not there, she did not reside there, she wasn't renting it.
18 There was another couple that was in that house living there
19 until she owned it, purchased it, and then owned it, and then
20 moved in.
21 THE COURT: So really, this is a new -- let me see if
22 I get this right.
23 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, if I can add one more
24 thing. She had another residence in London prior to the
25 Kinnerton Street residence.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016885
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document