This document is a page from a court transcript (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the case number 1:19-cr-00338) featuring testimony from a witness named Brune and statements by prosecutor Mr. Okula. Okula addresses the court to correct the record regarding Ms. Brune's speculation, stating that the government did not conduct independent 'Google research' upon receiving a specific note because they viewed it as innocuous and not a Brady violation. He clarifies that the government only realized the significance of the information when the defendants filed a motion.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
Testifying in court (redirect examination); speculated about the government's knowledge and research actions.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney (Government/Prosecution) |
Addressed the court to clarify the government's actions regarding a note and potential Brady violations.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the context of 'Google search' and 'Google research' regarding evidence.
|
||
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency identified in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, implied by the footer code DOJ-OGR.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court (Southern District of New York) based on the reporter firm.
|
"I thought the government had the same thing that we had."Source
"As a matter of fact, Judge, we didn't think that on the face of the note that it suggested Brady or any violation."Source
"We turned it over nonetheless, but we didn't conduct any independent investigation after we got the letter because we viewed it as pretty much innocuous."Source
"The first time we found out about it was when we saw the motion that the defendants filed."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,533 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document