DOJ-OGR-00017825.jpg
621 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
621 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between attorneys Ms. Moe (Government) and Ms. Menninger (Defense) regarding a witness named 'Jane.' The government requests permission for Jane to leave the district to return to her family while remaining available for potential recall, while the defense raises concerns regarding the witness's exposure to media coverage of the trial.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Witness |
A witness who has completed testimony and wishes to travel home to her family.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Government/Prosecution) |
Discussing logistics for witness Jane and transparency regarding communication with the witness.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Defense) |
Raising questions about trial coverage and confirming recollection about a second witness.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by attorneys regarding procedural rulings.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced in line 1 regarding conferring with witnesses.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdictional area where the trial is held; Jane wishes to leave it.
|
|
|
Where the trial is taking place.
|
Key Quotes (4)
"We just wanted to navigate that, otherwise I think we would make arrangements for Jane to travel home to her family today."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017825.jpg
Quote #1
"I wanted to be very transparent and candid about those contacts and just the state-of-play on this issue."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017825.jpg
Quote #2
"Otherwise, Jane would have to remain in the district for I think potentially a long time."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017825.jpg
Quote #3
"There is certainly substantial coverage of the trial including relaying witnesses' testimony."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017825.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,586 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 216 of 264 627
LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect
LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect
1 be recall that would prohibit the government from conferring
2 with a witness who's completed their testimony?
3 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. We just wanted to navigate
4 that, otherwise I think we would make arrangements for Jane to
5 travel home to her family today. And so if we wanted to make
6 those arrangements, we will need to be in touch with her to
7 make those arrangements, otherwise not planning to have
8 substantive communications, but I wanted to be very transparent
9 and candid about those contacts and just the state-of-play on
10 this issue.
11 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, my recollection is that
12 there was a second witness who was going to be offering prior
13 consistent statements for Jane.
14 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. I think our
15 preference would be for Jane to be permitted to leave the
16 district, but if we can be in touch with her about the
17 possibility of a need for recall after today, if there are
18 additional prior consistent statements, we can navigate it that
19 way. Otherwise, Jane would have to remain in the district for
20 I think potentially a long time.
21 MS. MENNINGER: I have no objection to that, your
22 Honor. I do have one clarifying question, which is, while not
23 observing the trial in the courtroom, there is certainly
24 substantial coverage of the trial including relaying witnesses'
25 testimony. So I don't know whether that has been clarified
2 with a witness who's completed their testimony?
3 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. We just wanted to navigate
4 that, otherwise I think we would make arrangements for Jane to
5 travel home to her family today. And so if we wanted to make
6 those arrangements, we will need to be in touch with her to
7 make those arrangements, otherwise not planning to have
8 substantive communications, but I wanted to be very transparent
9 and candid about those contacts and just the state-of-play on
10 this issue.
11 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, my recollection is that
12 there was a second witness who was going to be offering prior
13 consistent statements for Jane.
14 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. I think our
15 preference would be for Jane to be permitted to leave the
16 district, but if we can be in touch with her about the
17 possibility of a need for recall after today, if there are
18 additional prior consistent statements, we can navigate it that
19 way. Otherwise, Jane would have to remain in the district for
20 I think potentially a long time.
21 MS. MENNINGER: I have no objection to that, your
22 Honor. I do have one clarifying question, which is, while not
23 observing the trial in the courtroom, there is certainly
24 substantial coverage of the trial including relaying witnesses'
25 testimony. So I don't know whether that has been clarified
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017825
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document