DOJ-OGR-00017871.jpg

530 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 530 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca, and prosecutors Ms. Comey and Mr. Rohrbach regarding the scheduling of arguments related to 'piercing privilege' and 'waiver' concerning a witness named Jane. The parties also discuss the timeline of the trial, with the government estimating they have about one more week of testimony before resting.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Mr. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Discussing scheduling for the defense's case-in-chief and estimating trial timeline.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the discussion regarding scheduling and witness testimony.
Ms. Comey Prosecutor (Government)
Confirming the government's timeline for remaining testimony.
Mr. Rohrbach Prosecutor (Government)
Requesting to respond on Monday regarding the scheduling.
Jane Subject/Witness
Mentioned in relation to a 'theory of waiver' and whether she was told testifying would help her case.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Footer information.
DOJ
Inferred from Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.

Timeline (1 events)

August 10, 2022 (Filing Date)
Court proceeding regarding trial scheduling and the admissibility/waiver of privilege regarding a witness named Jane.
Courtroom (Southern District)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), based on reporter firm name and case context.

Relationships (2)

Mr. Pagliuca Adversarial/Opposing Counsel The Government
Pagliuca refers to 'the government' and their witness list separately from his own case-in-chief.
Ms. Comey Representative The Government
Ms. Comey speaks on behalf of the prosecution saying 'We're unlikely to rest'.

Key Quotes (4)

"narrow question of whether under theory of waiver he told Jane that it would -- testifying would help her in her case."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017871.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm assuming the government has about a week more of testimony, by my review of the witness list."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017871.jpg
Quote #2
"We're unlikely to rest in less than a week from now."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017871.jpg
Quote #3
"It will provide some general background on piercing privilege and waiver to the extent that will inform issues beyond the specific."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017871.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,292 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 262 of 264 674
LC1VMAX7
1 narrow question of whether under theory of waiver he told Jane
2 that it would -- testifying would help her in her case.
3 When would you like to do that?
4 MR. PAGLIUCA: How about Friday, your Honor?
5 THE COURT: This would be a witness you would call in
6 your case-in-chief?
7 MR. PAGLIUCA: Exactly. So it's at least a week from
8 now, I would imagine. I'm assuming the government has about a
9 week more of testimony, by my review of the witness list.
10 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I think that's right. We're
11 unlikely to rest in less than a week from now.
12 THE COURT: So is Friday okay?
13 MR. ROHRBACH: We can respond on Monday, if that's all
14 right.
15 THE COURT: Sure. Great.
16 It will provide some general background on piercing
17 privilege and waiver to the extent that will inform issues
18 beyond the specific.
19 MR. PAGLIUCA: To the extent we can preview the
20 additional issues, we'll get that underway as well so that you
21 have a sense of what may or may not be coming down the road
22 here.
23 THE COURT: Okay. Can I ask, thinking about timing,
24 now that we're where we are, what is your estimate for the
25 trial?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017871

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document