This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca, and prosecutors Ms. Comey and Mr. Rohrbach regarding the scheduling of arguments related to 'piercing privilege' and 'waiver' concerning a witness named Jane. The parties also discuss the timeline of the trial, with the government estimating they have about one more week of testimony before resting.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Discussing scheduling for the defense's case-in-chief and estimating trial timeline.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding scheduling and witness testimony.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor (Government) |
Confirming the government's timeline for remaining testimony.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Prosecutor (Government) |
Requesting to respond on Monday regarding the scheduling.
|
| Jane | Subject/Witness |
Mentioned in relation to a 'theory of waiver' and whether she was told testifying would help her case.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| DOJ |
Inferred from Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), based on reporter firm name and case context.
|
"narrow question of whether under theory of waiver he told Jane that it would -- testifying would help her in her case."Source
"I'm assuming the government has about a week more of testimony, by my review of the witness list."Source
"We're unlikely to rest in less than a week from now."Source
"It will provide some general background on piercing privilege and waiver to the extent that will inform issues beyond the specific."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,292 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document