DOJ-OGR-00001532.jpg

623 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order
File Size: 623 KB
Summary

A court order filed on July 6, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses the scheduling of an arraignment and bail hearing, proposing remote proceedings due to COVID-19 safety concerns. It outlines specific time slots available for video appearances from the Metropolitan Detention Center (July 9 or July 14) and orders counsel to confer and file a joint letter by 9:00 p.m. that night.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the criminal case and arraignment scheduling.
Alison J. Nathan District Judge
Judge presiding over the case and issuing the order.
Defense Counsel Legal Representative
Ordered to confer with the defendant regarding waiving physical presence.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States District Court Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction where the case is filed.
United States of America
The party bringing charges against Maxwell.
Metropolitan Detention Center
Facility where Maxwell is held, which has protocols limiting video appearance times.

Timeline (3 events)

2020-07-09
Alternative Remote Hearing Slot 1 (9:00 a.m.)
Remote / Video from MDC
2020-07-10
Proposed Arraignment/Bail Hearing (Requested by Government)
US District Court SDNY (potentially remote)
Ghislaine Maxwell Counsel Judge Nathan
2020-07-14
Alternative Remote Hearing Slot 2 (Morning)
Remote / Video from MDC

Locations (2)

Location Context
Court location.
Location of defendant's custody.

Relationships (2)

United States of America Legal Adversaries Ghislaine Maxwell
Case caption: United States of America -v- Ghislaine Maxwell
Alison J. Nathan Judge/Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell
Matter assigned to Judge Nathan regarding Defendant Maxwell

Key Quotes (3)

"In light of the COVID public health crisis, there are significant safety issues related to in-court proceedings."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001532.jpg
Quote #1
"If the Defendant is willing to waive her physical presence, this proceeding will be conducted remotely."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001532.jpg
Quote #2
"Counsel are hereby ordered to meet and confer regarding scheduling for this initial proceeding in light of these constraints."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001532.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,669 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 7 Filed 07/06/20 Page 1 of 4
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 7/6/2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United States of America,
-v-
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
20-CR-330 (AJN)
ORDER
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
This matter has been assigned to me for all purposes. In its July 5, 2020 letter, the
Government on behalf of the parties requested that the Court schedule an arraignment, initial
appearance, and bail hearing in this matter in the afternoon of Friday, July 10. See Dkt. No. 5.
In light of the COVID public health crisis, there are significant safety issues related to in-court
proceedings. If the Defendant is willing to waive her physical presence, this proceeding will be
conducted remotely. To that end, defense counsel should confer with the Defendant regarding
waiving her physical presence. If the Defendant wishes to waive her physical presence for this
proceeding, she and her counsel should sign the attached form in advance of the proceeding if
feasible.
If this proceeding is to be conducted remotely, there are protocols at the Metropolitan
Detention Center that limit the times at which the Defendant could be produced so that she could
appear by video. In the next week, the Defendant could be produced by video at either 9:00 a.m.
on July 9, 2020 or sometime during the morning of July 14, 2020. Counsel are hereby ordered to
meet and confer regarding scheduling for this initial proceeding in light of these constraints. If
counsel does anticipate proceeding remotely, by 9:00 p.m. tonight, counsel should file a joint
1
DOJ-OGR-00001532

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document