DOJ-OGR-00013015.jpg
559 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (trial proceedings)
File Size:
559 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger informs the Court that the government disclosed a violation of the sequestration order, where witness Jane called her brother, witness Brian, to discuss her testimony and a document shown during cross-examination. This occurred just before Brian was anticipated to testify regarding prior consistent statements.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Addressing the court regarding a witness violation of a sequestration order.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the trial proceedings.
|
| Brian | Witness |
Witness anticipated to testify; brother of witness Jane; recipient of unauthorized communication regarding testimony.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Witness who previously testified; sister of Brian; accused of violating sequestration order.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution team, disclosed the conversation with Brian to the defense.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR stamp in footer).
|
Key Quotes (4)
"We learned early this morning through a disclosure by the government that they have spoken with witness Brian."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013015.jpg
Quote #1
"Brian is the brother of witness Jane."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013015.jpg
Quote #2
"Jane called Brian and discussed with Brian her testimony in court, in violation of the Court's sequestration order."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013015.jpg
Quote #3
"She disclosed to him a document that she was shown on the stand during cross-examination"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013015.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,366 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 264 1424
LC7VMAX1
LC7VMAX1
1 (Trial resumed; jury not present)
2 THE COURT: Matters to take up.
3 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.
4 THE COURT: Go ahead, Ms. Menninger.
5 MS. MENNINGER: We learned early this morning through
6 a disclosure by the government that they have spoken with
7 witness Brian.
8 THE COURT: I'm sorry, could you pull up the mic
9 closer please. Thank you.
10 MS. MENNINGER: That they had spoken with witness
11 Brian, who was anticipated to testify today. Brian is the
12 brother of witness Jane.
13 THE COURT: Correct.
14 MS. MENNINGER: You may recall, your Honor, we had
15 litigation around prior consistent statements; and that Brian
16 is being offered in part to report supposedly prior consistent
17 statements with Jane. We had discussions about whether Jane
18 would be subject to recall in order to be questioned about
19 those particular prior consistent statements, should they be
20 admitted.
21 What we learned from the government early this morning
22 is that after her testimony, Jane called Brian and discussed
23 with Brian her testimony in court, in violation of the Court's
24 sequestration order. She disclosed to him a document that she
25 was shown on the stand during cross-examination; she gave her
2 THE COURT: Matters to take up.
3 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.
4 THE COURT: Go ahead, Ms. Menninger.
5 MS. MENNINGER: We learned early this morning through
6 a disclosure by the government that they have spoken with
7 witness Brian.
8 THE COURT: I'm sorry, could you pull up the mic
9 closer please. Thank you.
10 MS. MENNINGER: That they had spoken with witness
11 Brian, who was anticipated to testify today. Brian is the
12 brother of witness Jane.
13 THE COURT: Correct.
14 MS. MENNINGER: You may recall, your Honor, we had
15 litigation around prior consistent statements; and that Brian
16 is being offered in part to report supposedly prior consistent
17 statements with Jane. We had discussions about whether Jane
18 would be subject to recall in order to be questioned about
19 those particular prior consistent statements, should they be
20 admitted.
21 What we learned from the government early this morning
22 is that after her testimony, Jane called Brian and discussed
23 with Brian her testimony in court, in violation of the Court's
24 sequestration order. She disclosed to him a document that she
25 was shown on the stand during cross-examination; she gave her
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013015
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document