DOJ-OGR-00016737.jpg
597 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / legal filing
File Size:
597 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The transcript details a discussion where defense attorney Ms. Sternheim confirms the defense will not call a witness named Mr. Hamilton, citing concerns over public access limitations during remote testimony. Additionally, prosecutor Ms. Comey discusses the scheduling of custodian witnesses for a brief rebuttal presentation.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney (Prosecution/Government) |
Clarifying the record regarding Detective Byrne and technical issues.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney (Defense) |
Confirming the defense's decision not to call witness Mr. Hamilton.
|
| The Court | Judge (AJN - Alison J. Nathan) |
Presiding over the discussion and confirming the defense's decision.
|
| Mr. Hamilton | Potential Witness |
Defense decided not to call him due to concerns about public access limitations during remote testimony.
|
| Detective Byrne | Law Enforcement / Witness |
Mentioned by Ms. Pomerantz regarding an 'accurate representation' of facts.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney (Prosecution/Government) |
Discussing the timing and introduction of rebuttal evidence.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on reporter info and case number format.
|
Relationships (2)
Ms. Sternheim making the decision not to call Mr. Hamilton to the stand.
Ms. Pomerantz defending the record regarding Detective Byrne.
Key Quotes (4)
"I don't think that's an accurate representation as to Detective Byrne."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016737.jpg
Quote #1
"suffice it to say, we're not calling Mr. Hamilton."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016737.jpg
Quote #2
"Your concern is there would be a limitation of public access during his testimony, and for that reason, you've decided -- well, that's the case, and you've decided not to call him."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016737.jpg
Quote #3
"We just need to know whether we should have those witnesses — who are basically custodians — available at the end of today or if they should be available Monday."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016737.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,515 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 8 of 197 2549
LCFCmax1
LCFCmax1
1 a decision not to call him.
2 THE COURT: Okay.
3 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, just to clarify, I don't
4 think that's an accurate representation as to Detective Byrne.
5 And I, again, would note that the very capable tech
6 folks were here working and troubleshooting the issue. And I
7 understand the decision not to call Mr. Hamilton was not with
8 the technological issues, but instead a decision that defense
9 counsel has made.
10 MS. STERNHEIM: We could go on all day, Judge, but
11 suffice it to say, we're not calling Mr. Hamilton.
12 THE COURT: You're not calling Mr. Hamilton and you
13 have no additional application regarding being able to call him
14 remotely with public access at the same time. Your concern is
15 there would be a limitation of public access during his
16 testimony, and for that reason, you've decided -- well, that's
17 the case, and you've decided not to call him.
18 MS. STERNHEIM: That is correct. Thank you.
19 THE COURT: All right. Thank you. Anything else?
20 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, just in terms of timing, there
21 is one brief piece of evidence that we may seek to introduce as
22 rebuttal evidence. I think it would take 10 minutes, at most,
23 to get in. We just need to know whether we should have those
24 witnesses — who are basically custodians — available at the end
25 of today or if they should be available Monday.
2 THE COURT: Okay.
3 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, just to clarify, I don't
4 think that's an accurate representation as to Detective Byrne.
5 And I, again, would note that the very capable tech
6 folks were here working and troubleshooting the issue. And I
7 understand the decision not to call Mr. Hamilton was not with
8 the technological issues, but instead a decision that defense
9 counsel has made.
10 MS. STERNHEIM: We could go on all day, Judge, but
11 suffice it to say, we're not calling Mr. Hamilton.
12 THE COURT: You're not calling Mr. Hamilton and you
13 have no additional application regarding being able to call him
14 remotely with public access at the same time. Your concern is
15 there would be a limitation of public access during his
16 testimony, and for that reason, you've decided -- well, that's
17 the case, and you've decided not to call him.
18 MS. STERNHEIM: That is correct. Thank you.
19 THE COURT: All right. Thank you. Anything else?
20 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, just in terms of timing, there
21 is one brief piece of evidence that we may seek to introduce as
22 rebuttal evidence. I think it would take 10 minutes, at most,
23 to get in. We just need to know whether we should have those
24 witnesses — who are basically custodians — available at the end
25 of today or if they should be available Monday.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016737
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document