This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on January 15, 2025. It documents the cross-examination of an expert witness named Rocchio by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding 'Exhibit 6,' a study on barriers to and facilitators of delayed disclosure in abuse cases. The witness defends their opinion as being based on the totality of their professional experience rather than a single article.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness/Expert |
Under cross-examination regarding expert testimony on delayed disclosure.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney (Defense) |
Conducting cross-examination of the witness.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Stated 'No objection' to an exhibit.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing and admitting evidence.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ-OGR |
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction implied by the court reporter and case number structure.
|
"It's based on an interaction of the totality of my education, training, skills, experience, and knowledge of the scientific and clinical and professional literature."Source
"delayed disclosure is very common, they were trying to determine what sorts of things present as barriers to disclosure and as facilitators of disclosure."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,487 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document