DOJ-OGR-00015019.jpg

579 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 579 KB
Summary

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on January 15, 2025. It documents the cross-examination of an expert witness named Rocchio by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding 'Exhibit 6,' a study on barriers to and facilitators of delayed disclosure in abuse cases. The witness defends their opinion as being based on the totality of their professional experience rather than a single article.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Rocchio Witness/Expert
Under cross-examination regarding expert testimony on delayed disclosure.
Mr. Pagliuca Attorney (Defense)
Conducting cross-examination of the witness.
Ms. Pomerantz Attorney (Prosecution)
Stated 'No objection' to an exhibit.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing and admitting evidence.

Organizations (2)

Timeline (2 events)

2025-01-15
Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding delayed disclosure studies.
Courtroom
2025-01-15
Admission of Defendant's Exhibit B into evidence.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction implied by the court reporter and case number structure.

Relationships (1)

Mr. Pagliuca Legal Rocchio
Mr. Pagliuca is cross-examining Rocchio.

Key Quotes (2)

"It's based on an interaction of the totality of my education, training, skills, experience, and knowledge of the scientific and clinical and professional literature."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00015019.jpg
Quote #1
"delayed disclosure is very common, they were trying to determine what sorts of things present as barriers to disclosure and as facilitators of disclosure."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00015019.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,487 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 143 of 158 143
LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross
1 MS. POMERANTZ: No objection, your Honor.
2 THE COURT: Is admitted to the hearing record.
3 (Defendant's Exhibit B received in evidence)
4 MR. PAGLIUCA: If we could pull up Exhibit 6, please.
5 THE COURT: Government 6?
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, please.
7 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:
8 Q. Exhibit 6 is the study that you appear to have relied on
9 with regard to disclosure issues. Is that correct?
10 A. It's something I submitted in part, yes.
11 Q. Well, as you sit here today, can you tell us anything else
12 that you submitted with regard to your testimony about delayed
13 disclosure and supporting literature?
14 A. I couldn't give you a list, but, again, my opinions are not
15 based on any one article or even solely on my knowledge of the
16 literature. It's based on an interaction of the totality of my
17 education, training, skills, experience, and knowledge of the
18 scientific and clinical and professional literature.
19 Q. OK. So looking at Exhibit 6, this is a survey,
20 essentially, of a number of publications that talk about
21 barriers of disclosure. Correct?
22 A. So my understanding is, this was a study that was looking
23 at, understanding that delayed disclosure is very common, they
24 were trying to determine what sorts of things present as
25 barriers to disclosure and as facilitators of disclosure.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00015019

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document