DOJ-OGR-00008321.jpg
629 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / legal proceeding
File Size:
629 KB
Summary
This document is page 11 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330) dated December 10, 2021. The dialogue is between Ms. Moe (Prosecution) and the Court regarding the logistics of presenting evidence; specifically, they agree that while electronic display is standard, sensitive documents containing identifying information of victims should be provided to jurors in paper binders to prevent them from being seen on public courtroom screens.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Prosecution) |
AUSA Alison Moe; Speaking to the court regarding trial logistics, specifically regarding witness impeachment and prot...
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on the admissibility and method of displaying documents.
|
| Witness | Participant |
Unnamed hypothetical or future witness being discussed in the context of impeachment.
|
| Jurors | Participants |
Discussed regarding how they will view sensitive documents (paper binders vs screens).
|
| Victims | Subject |
Mentioned in the context of protecting identifying information.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Provider of the transcript.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated by the Bates stamp prefix DOJ-OGR.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on court reporter.
|
|
|
Physical setting where the podium and screens are located.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"exhibits under seal which contain identifying information or victims or other relative witnesses would be handled in paper copies with binders for the jurors?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008321.jpg
Quote #1
"Because the screens are visible."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008321.jpg
Quote #2
"But it's certainly consistent with standard practice to show the document electronically"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008321.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,611 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 536 Filed 12/10/21 Page 11 of 43 11
LBNAMAXTps
LBNAMAXTps
1 this trial in paper format is that there's just too much paper
2 involved. And the plan would be, if we're going to be
3 impeaching the witness, you know, on an inconsistent statement
4 or something else, that we would simply display that
5 electronically to the Court, counsel, and here at the podium,
6 and the witness, do the impeachment, and then take it down.
7 These would not be things that would be shown to the jurors.
8 But I want to make sure that that's an acceptable process to
9 the Court.
10 THE COURT: There are times when the witness will want
11 to see the full document, so you'll have those available should
12 they ask for them or need them. But it's certainly consistent
13 with standard practice to show the document electronically,
14 and, again, say, you want to see more, either the whole
15 document in paper or the page before or after, you'll
16 accommodate that. But otherwise, I don't see an issue.
17 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. As the Court may have
18 recalled, when the parties submitted a joint proposal with
19 respect to issues regarding witness anonymity, one of the joint
20 proposals was that exhibits under seal which contain
21 identifying information or victims or other relative witnesses
22 would be handled in paper copies with binders for the jurors?
23 THE COURT: Because the screens are visible.
24 MS. MOE: Exactly, your Honor. And so to the extent
25 any of those exhibits fall within that category, our view is
2 involved. And the plan would be, if we're going to be
3 impeaching the witness, you know, on an inconsistent statement
4 or something else, that we would simply display that
5 electronically to the Court, counsel, and here at the podium,
6 and the witness, do the impeachment, and then take it down.
7 These would not be things that would be shown to the jurors.
8 But I want to make sure that that's an acceptable process to
9 the Court.
10 THE COURT: There are times when the witness will want
11 to see the full document, so you'll have those available should
12 they ask for them or need them. But it's certainly consistent
13 with standard practice to show the document electronically,
14 and, again, say, you want to see more, either the whole
15 document in paper or the page before or after, you'll
16 accommodate that. But otherwise, I don't see an issue.
17 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. As the Court may have
18 recalled, when the parties submitted a joint proposal with
19 respect to issues regarding witness anonymity, one of the joint
20 proposals was that exhibits under seal which contain
21 identifying information or victims or other relative witnesses
22 would be handled in paper copies with binders for the jurors?
23 THE COURT: Because the screens are visible.
24 MS. MOE: Exactly, your Honor. And so to the extent
25 any of those exhibits fall within that category, our view is
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00008321
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document