This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) detailing a sidebar conference between the Court, Mr. Pagliuca, and Ms. Sternheim. The discussion centers on the legal procedure for 'piercing the privilege' regarding lawyer witnesses under subpoena. Specifically, the parties are discussing the prosecution's intent to call a witness named Glassman.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the sidebar conference, discussing timing for briefs and witness permission.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Discussing the complexity of briefing issues related to potential witnesses and lawyer privilege.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney (Defense) |
Participating in the sidebar, making a remark about turning back time.
|
| Glassman | Potential Witness |
Subject of the legal discussion regarding 'piercing the privilege' and being called to testify.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR)
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on case number and court reporters.
|
"if you're going to brief piercing the privilege."Source
"we may have issues related to lawyer witnesses that are under subpoena"Source
"Let's start with the limited issue that was raised today, which is that you would call -- you're seeking to call Glassman."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,344 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document