This document is a page from a court transcript (Page 320) filed on March 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is being questioned by the Court regarding their decision not to inform the government that 'Juror No. 1' might be a suspended lawyer. Brune explains they assumed the government, with its superior investigative resources and paralegals, had already 'Googled' the juror and reached their own conclusions.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness / Attorney |
Testifying on redirect regarding decisions made about investigating jurors.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Questioning the witness about why they did not consult the government regarding Juror No. 1.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Subject of the inquiry; suspected of being a 'suspended lawyer'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Westlaw |
Mentioned in relation to a report about the juror.
|
|
|
Used by the witness and presumed used by the government to research jurors.
|
||
| The Government |
Referred to as the opposing party investigating jurors.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely SDNY, implied by the court reporter's name.
|
"Did you ever consider consulting with the government about the wild possibility that Juror No. 1 was in fact a suspended lawyer"Source
"I assumed that the government and its paralegals and all the rest Googled the jurors"Source
"I didn't think it was the suspended lawyer."Source
"they're pretty good investigators and they have access to more"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,601 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document