DOJ-OGR-00010060.jpg

474 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (redirect examination)
File Size: 474 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Page 320) filed on March 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is being questioned by the Court regarding their decision not to inform the government that 'Juror No. 1' might be a suspended lawyer. Brune explains they assumed the government, with its superior investigative resources and paralegals, had already 'Googled' the juror and reached their own conclusions.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Brune Witness / Attorney
Testifying on redirect regarding decisions made about investigating jurors.
The Court Judge
Questioning the witness about why they did not consult the government regarding Juror No. 1.
Juror No. 1 Juror
Subject of the inquiry; suspected of being a 'suspended lawyer'.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Westlaw
Mentioned in relation to a report about the juror.
Google
Used by the witness and presumed used by the government to research jurors.
The Government
Referred to as the opposing party investigating jurors.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-03-24 (Filing Date)
Court testimony (Redirect of Brune) regarding the investigation of Juror No. 1's potential status as a suspended lawyer.
Southern District Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely SDNY, implied by the court reporter's name.

Relationships (1)

Brune Adversarial / Legal Opponents The Government
Witness states: 'I think that the government and I come to different conclusions sometimes about things'

Key Quotes (4)

"Did you ever consider consulting with the government about the wild possibility that Juror No. 1 was in fact a suspended lawyer"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010060.jpg
Quote #1
"I assumed that the government and its paralegals and all the rest Googled the jurors"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010060.jpg
Quote #2
"I didn't think it was the suspended lawyer."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010060.jpg
Quote #3
"they're pretty good investigators and they have access to more"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010060.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,601 characters)

Case 1:20-cv-00033-DAB Document 1646-22 Filed 03/24/22 Page 29 of 30
A-5777
C2GFDAU3
Brune - redirect
320
1 time that I took that approach. I don't think it changes the
2 picture because I don't think the Westlaw report itself has the
3 picture. But what I had in making this decision was I figured
4 they'd Googled, I Googled. I figured they didn't think she was
5 a suspended lawyer based on the Google search and the note to
6 the Court. I didn't think it was the suspended lawyer. But I
7 figured if they were going to raise the Google issue, I'd lay
8 it out.
9 THE COURT: Did you ever consider consulting with the
10 government about the wild possibility that Juror No. 1 was in
11 fact a suspended lawyer, given your testimony right now that it
12 was your assumption that the government was also looking into
13 jurors on the internet?
14 THE WITNESS: I did not. I think that the government
15 and I come to different conclusions sometimes about things, but
16 I know --
17 THE COURT: Why not? Why not? If you knew that -- if
18 it was your assumption that they were expending the same kind
19 of resources researching the matter as you were.
20 THE WITNESS: I'm a little bit in a zone where I'm not
21 describing my thought processes, because I didn't think about
22 raising it with the government. But what I'm trying to say is
23 I assumed that the government and its paralegals and all the
24 rest Googled the jurors and I don't always agree with them, but
25 they're pretty good investigators and they have access to more
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010060

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document