This document is a page from a legal filing dated April 12, 2021, arguing against Ghislaine Maxwell's request for temporary release. It asserts that Judge Nathan did not abuse discretion in denying release because Maxwell has ample resources, including 'highly qualified' counsel and extensive access to computers (13 hours/day) to review discovery at the MDC. Footnotes clarify legal precedents and note that in-person attorney visitation at the MDC resumed in February 2021.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of the bail motion; incarcerated at MDC.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
District court judge whose discretion regarding temporary release is being defended.
|
| Defense Counsel | Legal Team |
Described as a team of highly qualified, retained counsel representing Maxwell.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MDC |
Facility where Maxwell is detained and providing her a desktop computer.
|
|
| Government |
Providing a laptop for Maxwell's exclusive use to review discovery.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Cited in footnote 7 (United States v. Hochevar).
|
|
| DOJ |
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Detention center where Maxwell is held.
|
"Judge Nathan can hardly be said to have abused her discretion by finding that temporary release is not 'necessary' for Maxwell to prepare her defense."Source
"Maxwell is represented by a team of highly qualified, retained counsel, and has resources to prepare her defense far beyond those of the average defendant."Source
"Maxwell has access to a desktop computer provided by the MDC and a laptop provided by the Government for Maxwell’s exclusive use to review discovery thirteen hours per day, seven days per week."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,639 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document