DOJ-OGR-00001339.jpg

684 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal brief (appellate)
File Size: 684 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing dated April 12, 2021, arguing against Ghislaine Maxwell's request for temporary release. It asserts that Judge Nathan did not abuse discretion in denying release because Maxwell has ample resources, including 'highly qualified' counsel and extensive access to computers (13 hours/day) to review discovery at the MDC. Footnotes clarify legal precedents and note that in-person attorney visitation at the MDC resumed in February 2021.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Subject of the bail motion; incarcerated at MDC.
Judge Nathan Judge
District court judge whose discretion regarding temporary release is being defended.
Defense Counsel Legal Team
Described as a team of highly qualified, retained counsel representing Maxwell.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
MDC
Facility where Maxwell is detained and providing her a desktop computer.
Government
Providing a laptop for Maxwell's exclusive use to review discovery.
2d Cir.
Cited in footnote 7 (United States v. Hochevar).
DOJ
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (2 events)

2021-02-16
Resumption of in-person visitation at the MDC.
MDC
Attorneys Inmates
Ongoing (Daily)
Discovery review sessions.
MDC

Locations (1)

Location Context
MDC
Detention center where Maxwell is held.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Judge Judge Nathan
Document discusses Judge Nathan's ruling on Maxwell's bail motion.

Key Quotes (3)

"Judge Nathan can hardly be said to have abused her discretion by finding that temporary release is not 'necessary' for Maxwell to prepare her defense."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001339.jpg
Quote #1
"Maxwell is represented by a team of highly qualified, retained counsel, and has resources to prepare her defense far beyond those of the average defendant."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001339.jpg
Quote #2
"Maxwell has access to a desktop computer provided by the MDC and a laptop provided by the Government for Maxwell’s exclusive use to review discovery thirteen hours per day, seven days per week."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001339.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,639 characters)

Case 21-770, Document 40-1, 04/12/2021, 3075763, Page22 of 25
Maxwell’s access to counsel, and Maxwell did not renew her request for temporary
release in her third bail motion.7
39. Under these circumstances, Judge Nathan can hardly be said to
have abused her discretion by finding that temporary release is not “necessary” for
Maxwell to prepare her defense. “Temporary release is not warranted when a
defendant has had ample time to prepare his defense.” Scarborough, 821 F. App’x
at 601. That is the case here. Maxwell is represented by a team of highly qualified,
retained counsel, and has resources to prepare her defense far beyond those of the
average defendant. Maxwell has access to a desktop computer provided by the MDC
and a laptop provided by the Government for Maxwell’s exclusive use to review
discovery thirteen hours per day, seven days per week. (Ex. F at 29-30; Gov’t Ex. A
at 17-18). Also during that time, Maxwell has access to email with defense counsel,
calls with defense counsel, and legal visits (depending on pandemic-related
conditions).8 (Ex. F at 29-30; Gov’t Ex. A at 18-19). Maxwell currently receives
7 Thus, to the extent Maxwell’s arguments about her ability to prepare for trial are
tied to any developments since the time of her first bail motion—such as, for
example, the imminency of trial (see Br. 17)—this Court need not address such
arguments in the first instance. Cf. United States v. Hochevar, 214 F.3d 342, 344 (2d
Cir. 2000).
8 In-person visitation at the MDC resumed on or about February 16, 2021. Attorney
visits are permitted seven days per week. (Ex. A at 18-19).
22
DOJ-OGR-00001339

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document