DOJ-OGR-00018128.jpg

611 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 611 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves defense attorney Mr. Everdell and prosecutor Ms. Moe debating the admissibility and description of 'costumes' (Government Exhibit 53) and photographs of them (Exhibits 919 and 920). The defense argues specifically that these items must not be described to the jury as 'schoolgirl outfits' to avoid prejudice.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Mr. Everdell Defense Attorney
Arguing against the admission/description of specific evidence to the jury.
Ms. Moe Prosecutor (Government)
Discussing the procedure for laying a foundation for evidence without premature disclosure.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the discussion regarding evidence admissibility.
Witness 3 Witness
Mentioned as the relevant witness for the upcoming testimony.
The Agent Law Enforcement/Witness
Referenced as the person who found the items during a search.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Government
Refers to the prosecution team.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (referenced in footer bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding the admissibility and description of evidence (costumes) in the presence of the jury.
Courtroom
Unknown
Search where items (costumes) were found by an agent.
Unknown

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), implied by the court reporter's name.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Moe Employment/Representation Government
Ms. Moe speaks on behalf of the government regarding exhibits.
Mr. Everdell Legal Subject Witness 3
Mr. Everdell discusses Witness 3 in the context of evidence.

Key Quotes (4)

"They can't be described as schoolgirl outfits."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018128.jpg
Quote #1
"Government Exhibits 919 and 920, are photographs of the costumes outside of the box"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018128.jpg
Quote #2
"the costumes themselves are Government Exhibit 53"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018128.jpg
Quote #3
"If I'm permitted to lead the witness and direct her not to describe them, I'll just lay that"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018128.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,714 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 27 of 236 931
LBUCmax1
1 that has to be, from what I understand, witness 3.
2 And so I don't think these should be admitted. I
3 don't think they should be shown. If the government wants to
4 introduce pictures of them, which I know is Government Exhibits
5 919 and 920, are photographs of the costumes outside of the box
6 I believe, and the costumes themselves are Government Exhibit
7 53, the government wants to get the agent to describe certain
8 items they found without exactly describing what they were, but
9 have those items somewhat generally described and the
10 photographs, you can describe taking a photograph of certain
11 items, but not described in a way that the jury is going to
12 know what they are. They can't be described as schoolgirl
13 outfits.
14 THE COURT: Right. I think it's consistent with what
15 Ms. Moe said, which is basically some version of showing the
16 items to the witness but not the jury, and just simply asking,
17 without describing what they are, did you find these items
18 during the search.
19 MR. EVERDELL: As long as there is no description of
20 the items and no showing them to the jury, I don't I think I
21 have a problem.
22 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor, that's what I was trying to
23 flag, a way of laying the foundation without putting before the
24 jury prematurely what they are. If I'm permitted to lead the
25 witness and direct her not to describe them, I'll just lay that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018128

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document