This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves defense attorney Mr. Everdell and prosecutor Ms. Moe debating the admissibility and description of 'costumes' (Government Exhibit 53) and photographs of them (Exhibits 919 and 920). The defense argues specifically that these items must not be described to the jury as 'schoolgirl outfits' to avoid prejudice.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing against the admission/description of specific evidence to the jury.
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor (Government) |
Discussing the procedure for laying a foundation for evidence without premature disclosure.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding evidence admissibility.
|
| Witness 3 | Witness |
Mentioned as the relevant witness for the upcoming testimony.
|
| The Agent | Law Enforcement/Witness |
Referenced as the person who found the items during a search.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government |
Refers to the prosecution team.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), implied by the court reporter's name.
|
"They can't be described as schoolgirl outfits."Source
"Government Exhibits 919 and 920, are photographs of the costumes outside of the box"Source
"the costumes themselves are Government Exhibit 53"Source
"If I'm permitted to lead the witness and direct her not to describe them, I'll just lay that"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,714 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document