DOJ-OGR-00003093.jpg
446 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal brief (containing deposition transcript)
File Size:
446 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed April 16, 2021) containing excerpts of a deposition. The defendant (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) testifies that she was unaware of Jeffrey Epstein having sexual activities with anyone other than herself, a 'blond,' and a 'brunette' during the 1990s and 2000s. The document includes legal analysis arguing that the defendant's statement '[w]hen I was with him' referred strictly to moments of sexual acts rather than the duration of their relationship.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Epstein | Subject of inquiry |
Jeffrey Epstein; subject of questions regarding sexual activities.
|
| The Defendant | Witness/Accused |
Likely Ghislaine Maxwell (based on case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE); providing testimony regarding knowledge of Epstein...
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Lawyer raising objections during the deposition.
|
| Unidentified Blond | Participant |
Identified as having been involved in three-way sexual activities with Epstein and the defendant.
|
| Unidentified Brunette | Participant |
Identified as having been involved in three-way sexual activities with Epstein and the defendant.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Inferred from Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
1990s and 2000s
Sexual activities involving Epstein
Unknown
Relationships (3)
Testimony regarding 'when I was with him' and involvement in three-way sexual activities.
Identified as having been involved in three-way sexual activities.
Identified as having been involved in three-way sexual activities.
Key Quotes (4)
"I wasn't aware that he was having sexual activities with anyone when I was with him other than myself."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003093.jpg
Quote #1
"Is it your testimony that in the 1990s and 2000s, you were not aware that Mr. Epstein was having sexual activities with anyone other than yourself and the blond and brunette on those few occasions when they were involved with you?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00003093.jpg
Quote #2
"That is my testimony, that is correct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003093.jpg
Quote #3
"In the defendant’s telling, the phrase “[w]hen I was with him,” refers not to the duration of the defendant’s relationship with Epstein, but instead to only those moments when she was in the act of having sex with Epstein..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003093.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,435 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 159 of 239
A. Can you repeat the question?
[REDACTED BLOCK]
MR. PAGLIUCA: Same objection.
A. No.
Q. Other than yourself and the blond and brunette that you have identified as having been involved in three-way sexual activities, with whom did Mr. Epstein have sexual activities?
[REDACTED BLOCK]
A. I wasn't aware that he was having sexual activities with anyone when I was with him other than myself.
Q. I want to be sure that I'm clear. Is it your testimony that in the 1990s and 2000s, you were not aware that Mr. Epstein was having sexual activities with anyone other than yourself and the blond and brunette on those few occasions when they were involved with you?
A. That is my testimony, that is correct.
[REDACTED BLOCK]
The defendant primarily argues that her answers were literally true. In the defendant’s telling, the phrase “[w]hen I was with him,” refers not to the duration of the defendant’s relationship with Epstein, but instead to only those moments when she was in the act of having sex with Epstein and either the blond or brunette identified above. (Def. Mot. 4 at 16).
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK] And in any event, she further argues, because the question asked the defendant about the 1990s and 2000s, it therefore covered any “‘sexual activities’ spanning more than a millennium.” (Id. at 16-17).
132
DOJ-OGR-00003093
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document