DOJ-OGR-00002361(1).jpg
502 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court motion (defense filing)
File Size:
502 KB
Summary
This is page 14 of a legal filing (Document 134) from the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The text argues that the government previously failed to act on perjury charges despite attorney David Boies claiming they had Maxwell 'dead to rights.' The filing alleges that a judicial officer (name redacted) was misled by an Assistant U.S. Attorney's misrepresentations, leading to the modification of a Protective Order. A large portion of the page is redacted.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of potential perjury charges; footnote states she 'strenuously disagrees' with Boies' comments.
|
| David Boies | Attorney (Plaintiff's) |
Described as 'particularly frustrated' by the government's failure to pursue a perjury charge; quoted saying 'We have...
|
| Assistant U.S. Attorney | Government Prosecutor |
Accused of making 'misrepresentations' that a redacted individual relied upon.
|
| [Redacted] | Judge or Judicial Officer (implied) |
Person who 'modified the Protective Order' and 'relied on the Assistant U.S. Attorney’s misrepresentations' (context ...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The government |
United States Government/Department of Justice; accused of inaction regarding perjury and making misrepresentations.
|
|
| Chemical Bank |
Referenced in a legal citation regarding a subpoena.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-02-04
Filing of Document 134 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
US District Court (SDNY implied)
Defense Counsel
Relationships (2)
Boies wanted to pursue perjury charges against her, claiming he had her 'dead to rights'.
The redacted individual relied on the AUSA's representations to make a finding.
Key Quotes (5)
"Boies “was particularly frustrated by the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell]”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002361(1).jpg
Quote #1
"“We have her dead to rights.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002361(1).jpg
Quote #2
"All of this contradicts The government’s representations to [REDACTED]"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002361(1).jpg
Quote #3
"[REDACTED] relied on the Assistant U.S. Attorney’s misrepresentations"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002361(1).jpg
Quote #4
"Ms. Maxwell strenuously disagrees with Mr. Boies’ comments."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002361(1).jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,098 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 14 of 23
At that time, however, the government did not act. Boies “was particularly frustrated by
the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell],” reported one person, who recalled him
saying, “We have her dead to rights.”⁵ Id. All of this contradicts The government’s
representations to [REDACTED], who specifically [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell],” reported one person, who recalled him
saying, “We have her dead to rights.”⁵ Id. All of this contradicts The government’s
representations to [REDACTED], who specifically [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Reassured by the government that [REDACTED] modified
the Protective Order so that [REDACTED] could comply with the subpoena. Ex. F. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] found that [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]. In making this finding, [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] relied on the Assistant U.S. Attorney’s misrepresentations, and she [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] from the subpoena at issue in Chemical Bank. Said
[REDACTED]
the Protective Order so that [REDACTED] could comply with the subpoena. Ex. F. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] found that [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]. In making this finding, [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] relied on the Assistant U.S. Attorney’s misrepresentations, and she [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] from the subpoena at issue in Chemical Bank. Said
[REDACTED]
[LARGE BLOCK REDACTION]
Ex. G, p 21.
__________________________________________________________________
⁵ Ms. Maxwell strenuously disagrees with Mr. Boies’ comments. We reference them here only to
show their connection to the perjury counts that the government subsequently charged.
⁵ Ms. Maxwell strenuously disagrees with Mr. Boies’ comments. We reference them here only to
show their connection to the perjury counts that the government subsequently charged.
9
DOJ-OGR-00002361
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document