This page contains a transcript of the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Dr. Rocchio provides expert testimony refuting an older article's conclusion that there is no consensus on 'grooming,' arguing that while universal agreement on every detail is rare in social science, there is definite scientific consensus on the phenomena of grooming and child sexual abuse.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness/Expert |
Testifying on direct examination regarding scientific consensus on grooming and child sexual abuse.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney |
Conducting the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, asking for clarification.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated by the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on the court reporter's name (Southern District of New York).
|
"If they're defining consensus there as universal agreement as to exact -- everything within the process of grooming, then sure. But when we're talking about any pattern of behavior or any phenomenon within the social science, it's a complicated phenomenon."Source
"But most definitely, there's consensus within the scientific literature about the phenomenon not only of grooming, but the phenomenon of child sexual abuse itself..."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,520 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document