DOJ-OGR-00016767.jpg
505 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
505 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues to the Judge that the defense should be allowed to highlight that the allegations are 25 years old. He asserts this explains the absence of corroborating evidence, such as geo-location data, because records are destroyed over such a long period.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (Defense) |
Speaking to the judge regarding the age of allegations and lack of geo-location evidence.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney |
Mentioned by the first speaker (likely the Judge or Prosecution) who agrees 'a little' with him.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by Mr. Everdell.
|
| The Jury | Jury |
Mentioned by Everdell as the target audience for the argument about the age of allegations.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Refers to the prosecution; the speaker discusses wanting them to testify regarding geo-location info.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting firm listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell)
Southern District of New York (Implied by reporter name)
Relationships (1)
Everdell is arguing about the government's lack of evidence/geo-location data.
Key Quotes (3)
"I'm not sure why you want the government or if this is a spin to make -- to try to hide what the question is doing"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016767.jpg
Quote #1
"These are allegations that are 25 years old, and when you make a case on allegations that are more than 25 years old, you're not going to have the same type of corroboration available to you because records get destroyed in that amount of time."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016767.jpg
Quote #2
"So the absence of evidence goes to the fact that these are 25-year-old allegations."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016767.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,186 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 38 of 197 2579
LCFCmax1
LCFCmax1
1 You essentially want the -- I'm a little with Mr. Rohrbach.
2 I'm not sure why you want the government or if this is a spin
3 to make -- to try to hide what the question is doing, but you
4 want the government to testify, well, we didn't get geo
5 location information because it didn't exist.
6 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I'll be very transparent.
7 I think the point is highlighting the age of the allegations,
8 which I think is a fair point to make to the jury. These are
9 allegations that are 25 years old, and when you make a case on
10 allegations that are more than 25 years old, you're not going
11 to have the same type of corroboration available to you because
12 records get destroyed in that amount of time. The records
13 aren't available that long ago that are available today that
14 you might otherwise expect to to see in a case like this.
15 But the bigger point is just the age of the
16 allegations. So the absence of evidence goes to the fact that
17 these are 25-year-old allegations.
18 (Continued on next page)
2 I'm not sure why you want the government or if this is a spin
3 to make -- to try to hide what the question is doing, but you
4 want the government to testify, well, we didn't get geo
5 location information because it didn't exist.
6 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I'll be very transparent.
7 I think the point is highlighting the age of the allegations,
8 which I think is a fair point to make to the jury. These are
9 allegations that are 25 years old, and when you make a case on
10 allegations that are more than 25 years old, you're not going
11 to have the same type of corroboration available to you because
12 records get destroyed in that amount of time. The records
13 aren't available that long ago that are available today that
14 you might otherwise expect to to see in a case like this.
15 But the bigger point is just the age of the
16 allegations. So the absence of evidence goes to the fact that
17 these are 25-year-old allegations.
18 (Continued on next page)
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016767
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document