DOJ-OGR-00016495.jpg

543 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 543 KB
Summary

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves the Judge ('The Court'), prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell discussing the admissibility of Ghislaine Maxwell's 2019 deposition. The key issue is distinguishing between when Maxwell began living in a specific home (allegedly 1992 or 1993) versus when she officially owned it.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant/Subject
Subject of the discussion regarding her residency dates and 2019 deposition.
Mr. Rohrbach Prosecutor (Government)
Arguing for the government regarding the introduction of deposition testimony.
Mr. Everdell Defense Attorney
Arguing for the defense regarding the probative nature of evidence concerning property ownership vs. residency.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, questioning counsel about admissibility of evidence.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Government
Refers to the prosecution team.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
DOJ
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (3 events)

1992 or 1993
Start date of Maxwell living in 'the home' according to deposition
The home
1997
Reference date regarding whether Maxwell lived in the house prior to this year
The home
2019
Ms. Maxwell's Deposition
Unknown

Locations (1)

Location Context
Unspecified residential property where Maxwell allegedly lived beginning in 1992 or 1993.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Maxwell Residency/Ownership The home
Discussion centers on whether she lived there starting in '92/'93 versus when she owned it.

Key Quotes (3)

"Maxwell's 2019 deposition indicates that she lived in the home beginning in '92 or '93?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016495.jpg
Quote #1
"So we're going to have a trial on -- we're going to have a little mini trial on whether -- on whether Ms. Maxwell lived -- not owned, but lived in that house prior to 1997?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016495.jpg
Quote #2
"Your evidence goes to when she owned it. Right?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016495.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,341 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 246 2307
LCGVMAX1
1 the government explained in its letter, including the
2 deposition --
3 THE COURT: So the government indicates that Ms.
4 Maxwell's 2019 deposition indicates that she lived in the home
5 beginning in '92 or '93?
6 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Would the government seek to introduce
8 that testimony if I let in the legal documents?
9 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, we would, your Honor.
10 THE COURT: Okay. So we're going to have a trial
11 on -- we're going to have a little mini trial on whether -- on
12 whether Ms. Maxwell lived -- not owned, but lived in that house
13 prior to 1997?
14 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, this is, I think, hardly a
15 mini trial. This is extremely probative --
16 THE COURT: What about the testimony, deposition
17 testimony, in which she said she lived there beginning in '92
18 or '93; it comes in, doesn't it?
19 MR. EVERDELL: We can argue that, I suppose, your
20 Honor. But even if it does come in, they can argue that that
21 shows that she's --
22 THE COURT: Well, that goes directly to when she lived
23 there. Your evidence goes to when she owned it. Right?
24 MR. EVERDELL: That's right. But --
25 THE COURT: So when she -- I see the relevance for
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016495

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document