This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves the Judge ('The Court'), prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell discussing the admissibility of Ghislaine Maxwell's 2019 deposition. The key issue is distinguishing between when Maxwell began living in a specific home (allegedly 1992 or 1993) versus when she officially owned it.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant/Subject |
Subject of the discussion regarding her residency dates and 2019 deposition.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Prosecutor (Government) |
Arguing for the government regarding the introduction of deposition testimony.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing for the defense regarding the probative nature of evidence concerning property ownership vs. residency.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, questioning counsel about admissibility of evidence.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Refers to the prosecution team.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Unspecified residential property where Maxwell allegedly lived beginning in 1992 or 1993.
|
"Maxwell's 2019 deposition indicates that she lived in the home beginning in '92 or '93?"Source
"So we're going to have a trial on -- we're going to have a little mini trial on whether -- on whether Ms. Maxwell lived -- not owned, but lived in that house prior to 1997?"Source
"Your evidence goes to when she owned it. Right?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,341 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document