This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct testimony of expert witness Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, questioned by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim, regarding the fallibility and constructive nature of human memory. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz successfully objects to a leading question posed by the defense.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Loftus | Witness / Expert |
Testifying on direct examination regarding the nature of human memory.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Conducting the direct examination of the witness.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Prosecutor |
Raising an objection to Ms. Sternheim's questioning.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Ruling on the objection (Judge Paul A. Engelmayer based on case number).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp prefix)
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number and court reporter.
|
"Post-event suggestion typically refers to a situation where you're supplying people with new information that is not particularly accurate."Source
"we don't just record events and play it back later like a recording device would work, like a video machine, but rather, we are actually constructing our memories when we retrieve memories."Source
"We often take bits and pieces of experience sometimes that occurred at different times and places, bring it together, and construct what feels like a recollection."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,445 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document