DOJ-OGR-00001449.jpg

620 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal brief (appellate level)
File Size: 620 KB
Summary

This document is page 9 of a court filing from May 27, 2021, related to Case 21-770 regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the procedural history of Maxwell's failed appeals for bail/pretrial release and the court's affirmation of Judge Nathan's decisions on April 27, 2021. The text specifically highlights Maxwell's complaints regarding her conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically '15-minute light surveillance,' and notes that the appellate court directed such specific relief requests back to the District Court.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Subject of bail appeals and confinement conditions motions.
Judge Nathan District Court Judge
Judge whose bail decisions were appealed; recipient of letter regarding sleeping conditions.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center; facility where Maxwell is confined.
District Court
Lower court handling the trial and specific confinement relief requests.
Government
Prosecution; ordered to submit updates on confinement.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2021-04-27
Court affirmed Judge Nathan's bail decisions and denied Maxwell's motion for pretrial release.
Court of Appeals (implied)
2021-04-29
Maxwell submitted a letter to Judge Nathan regarding light surveillance.
District Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
MDC
Detention facility housing Maxwell.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Judge Judge Nathan
Maxwell appealed Judge Nathan's bail decisions; Maxwell wrote letter to Judge Nathan.

Key Quotes (2)

"relief specific to [Maxwell’s] sleeping conditions... should be addressed to the District Court."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001449.jpg
Quote #1
"address Ms. Maxwell’s sleeping conditions by directing the MDC to cease 15-minute light surveillance of Ms. Maxwell or justify the need for the disruptive"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001449.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,448 characters)

Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page9 of 24
monitored Maxwell’s conditions of confinement, including by ordering the
Government to submit regular updates regarding that topic (see Gov’t Ex. A
(compiling update letters and relevant court orders)), and by reviewing and
addressing defense motions regarding Maxwell’s conditions of confinement (see,
e.g., id. at 10-11).
16. Maxwell appealed Judge Nathan’s latter two bail decisions. In
connection with that appeal, Maxwell also moved for pretrial release pending appeal.
After receiving briefing and hearing oral argument, this Court affirmed Judge
Nathan’s bail decisions and denied Maxwell’s motion for pretrial release on April
27, 2021. (Mot. Ex. A). Responding to claims about Maxwell’s sleeping
conditions that had been raised in her briefing and at oral argument, this Court’s
order noted that any request for “relief specific to [Maxwell’s] sleeping conditions”
at the MDC “should be addressed to the District Court.” (Id.).
17. At no point after this Court’s bail decision did Maxwell file a
renewed motion for pretrial release in the District Court.
18. Following the issuance of this Court’s decision, on April 29,
2021, Maxwell submitted a letter to Judge Nathan asking the District Court “to
address Ms. Maxwell’s sleeping conditions by directing the MDC to cease 15-
minute light surveillance of Ms. Maxwell or justify the need for the disruptive
9
DOJ-OGR-00001449

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document