DOJ-OGR-00001910.jpg
599 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
599 KB
Summary
This document is page 33 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 10, 2020. The discussion between the Court and prosecutor Ms. Moe concerns the details of the defendant's arrest, specifically confirming that the defendant ignored law enforcement commands to open the door and retreated to a separate room. The Court also notes an allegation that the defendant attempted to block location monitoring by wrapping a cell phone in foil.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Government Attorney/Prosecutor |
Speaking on behalf of the government regarding the details of the arrest.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, questioning the government about the defendant's behavior during arrest.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the arrest discussion (contextually Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number 1:20-cr-00330). Accused of wrap...
|
| The Agent | Law Enforcement |
Involved in breaching the door during the arrest; consulted by Ms. Moe.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government | ||
| DOJ |
Indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Timeline (2 events)
Morning of defendant's arrest
Law enforcement breached the door; defendant resisted opening the door and retreated to a separate room.
Defendant's residence
The Defendant
Law Enforcement Agents
Morning of defendant's arrest
Defendant allegedly placed a cell phone in foil to conceal location monitoring.
Defendant's residence
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
implied location of arrest/door breach
|
|
|
Room the defendant retreated to during the raid
|
Key Quotes (3)
"there is a suggestion of an effort to conceal location monitoring of some type by placing a cell phone in foil of some kind."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001910.jpg
Quote #1
"she resisted opening the door in the face of being informed that authorities were seeking entry"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001910.jpg
Quote #2
"the defendant did not respond to law enforcement announcing their presence and directing her to open the door; that, instead, she left and went into a separate room."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001910.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,503 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 33 of 91
33
k7e2MaxC kjc
33
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 information. So we were first notified about the circumstances
2 the morning of the defendant's arrest, but I wanted to
3 personally confer with the agent who was involved in breaching
4 the door and verify that before including that information in a
5 brief before the court. That's the reason for the delay, your
6 Honor.
7 THE COURT: Okay. But the government has done that
8 confirmation process and is confident of the information
9 provided and the basic contention there is -- the basic
10 contention there is that she resisted opening the door in the
11 face of being informed that authorities were seeking entry and
12 there is a suggestion of an effort to conceal location
13 monitoring of some type by placing a cell phone in foil of some
14 kind.
15 Could you explain what the government's understanding
16 factually is and what you think I should derive from that?
17 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
18 And, with apologies, we were very careful to make sure
19 that the specific language in our briefing was accurate in
20 consultation with the agents, so I don't want to add additional
21 facts or speak extemporaneously about that; but, in short, that
22 is correct that the defendant did not respond to law
23 enforcement announcing their presence and directing her to open
24 the door; that, instead, she left and went into a separate
25 room.
2 the morning of the defendant's arrest, but I wanted to
3 personally confer with the agent who was involved in breaching
4 the door and verify that before including that information in a
5 brief before the court. That's the reason for the delay, your
6 Honor.
7 THE COURT: Okay. But the government has done that
8 confirmation process and is confident of the information
9 provided and the basic contention there is -- the basic
10 contention there is that she resisted opening the door in the
11 face of being informed that authorities were seeking entry and
12 there is a suggestion of an effort to conceal location
13 monitoring of some type by placing a cell phone in foil of some
14 kind.
15 Could you explain what the government's understanding
16 factually is and what you think I should derive from that?
17 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
18 And, with apologies, we were very careful to make sure
19 that the specific language in our briefing was accurate in
20 consultation with the agents, so I don't want to add additional
21 facts or speak extemporaneously about that; but, in short, that
22 is correct that the defendant did not respond to law
23 enforcement announcing their presence and directing her to open
24 the door; that, instead, she left and went into a separate
25 room.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001910
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001910
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document