DOJ-OGR-00020837.jpg
560 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
560 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated February 28, 2023 (filing date). Attorneys Mr. Everdell (Defense) and Ms. Moe (Prosecution) are arguing over how to answer a jury question regarding 'Count Four' and 'Jane.' The debate centers on whether a 'return flight' from New Mexico can serve as the basis for a conviction if the initial flight's intent for illegal sexual activity is in question.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing that the return flight alone cannot be the basis for a conviction on Count Four because it lacks illegal purp...
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor |
Arguing against a 'no' answer, stating the jury could infer intent to engage in sexual conduct regarding the return f...
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Subject of the transportation/flight to New Mexico and alleged illegal sexual activity.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Accused of aiding in the transportation of Jane.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
The judge presiding over the trial, addressed by counsel.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Destination of the flight in question; location where alleged events may have occurred.
|
Relationships (2)
Discussion of defendant aiding in transportation of Jane for illegal sexual activity.
Everdell arguing on behalf of the defense interpretation.
Key Quotes (5)
"The only evidence we have of a flight to New Mexico with Jane is the one in the flight logs"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020837.jpg
Quote #1
"whether the flight to New Mexico was for the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020837.jpg
Quote #2
"could that be the basis alone for a conviction on Count Four"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020837.jpg
Quote #3
"Answer is no, because that return flight is not for the purpose of illegal sexual activity."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020837.jpg
Quote #4
"a jury could infer intent to engage in sexual conduct and the return of a flight in aiding and abetting that."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020837.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,603 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page11 of 221
A-211
A-211
3130
LCRVMAXT
1 question because they haven't identified a flight here.
2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think they've been fairly
3 clear. They say: If the defendant aided in the transportation
4 of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico. The
5 only evidence we have of a flight to New Mexico with Jane is
6 the one in the flight logs, and it is a flight to New Mexico.
7 And so the return flight would be some other flight besides the
8 flight to New Mexico.
9 She is also alleged that -- and to be honest, I think
10 it was a little unclear what may have happened in New Mexico
11 based on her testimony; but if there was any illegal sexual
12 conduct, the flight to New Mexico, this is what they are
13 debating, because they say, but not the flight to New Mexico,
14 where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity.
15 Okay. So it seems that the jury is deliberating or at
16 least trying to decide whether the flight to New Mexico was for
17 the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity. And they
18 are confused that the return flight that happens after that,
19 could that be the basis alone for a conviction on Count Four.
20 Answer is no, because that return flight is not for the purpose
21 of illegal sexual activity.
22 MS. MOE: Your Honor, at the very least, the answer to
23 this can't be no, because a jury could infer intent to engage
24 in sexual conduct and the return of a flight in aiding and
25 abetting that.
2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think they've been fairly
3 clear. They say: If the defendant aided in the transportation
4 of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico. The
5 only evidence we have of a flight to New Mexico with Jane is
6 the one in the flight logs, and it is a flight to New Mexico.
7 And so the return flight would be some other flight besides the
8 flight to New Mexico.
9 She is also alleged that -- and to be honest, I think
10 it was a little unclear what may have happened in New Mexico
11 based on her testimony; but if there was any illegal sexual
12 conduct, the flight to New Mexico, this is what they are
13 debating, because they say, but not the flight to New Mexico,
14 where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity.
15 Okay. So it seems that the jury is deliberating or at
16 least trying to decide whether the flight to New Mexico was for
17 the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity. And they
18 are confused that the return flight that happens after that,
19 could that be the basis alone for a conviction on Count Four.
20 Answer is no, because that return flight is not for the purpose
21 of illegal sexual activity.
22 MS. MOE: Your Honor, at the very least, the answer to
23 this can't be no, because a jury could infer intent to engage
24 in sexual conduct and the return of a flight in aiding and
25 abetting that.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00020837
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document