This document is page 8 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019. It discusses the legal concept of 'abatement' following the death of a defendant, citing the Second Circuit case *U.S. v. Wright*. The text explains that upon a defendant's death during a pending appeal, the conviction, indictment, restitution, and forfeiture orders are typically vacated.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Victims | Subject of court concern |
Court states responsibility to ensure they are treated fairly and with dignity
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
Party whose motion is being considered
|
| Deceased Defendant | Legal subject |
Referenced in the context of the 'rule of abatement' (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein in the broader case context, thou...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information
|
|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Cited regarding the case U.S. v. Wright and the rule of abatement
|
|
| U.S. Federal Courts |
Mentioned as having adopted the rule of abatement
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number and reporter information
|
"the court's responsibility... to ensure that the victims in this case are treated fairly and with dignity."Source
"The fundamental substantive principle which applies in considering the government's motion is termed the rule of abatement."Source
"when a convicted defendant dies while his direct appeal as of right is pending, his death abates not only the appeal, but also proceedings had during the course of the prosecution."Source
"any restitution ordered as a result of that conviction must also abate, and it is also ruled the same with respect to associated forfeiture orders."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,566 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document