DOJ-OGR-00000646.jpg

627 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript / legal filing
File Size: 627 KB
Summary

This document is page 8 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019. It discusses the legal concept of 'abatement' following the death of a defendant, citing the Second Circuit case *U.S. v. Wright*. The text explains that upon a defendant's death during a pending appeal, the conviction, indictment, restitution, and forfeiture orders are typically vacated.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Victims Subject of court concern
Court states responsibility to ensure they are treated fairly and with dignity
The Government Prosecution
Party whose motion is being considered
Deceased Defendant Legal subject
Referenced in the context of the 'rule of abatement' (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein in the broader case context, thou...

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Footer information
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Cited regarding the case U.S. v. Wright and the rule of abatement
U.S. Federal Courts
Mentioned as having adopted the rule of abatement

Timeline (1 events)

2019-09-03
Filing of Document 53 in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by case number and reporter information

Key Quotes (4)

"the court's responsibility... to ensure that the victims in this case are treated fairly and with dignity."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000646.jpg
Quote #1
"The fundamental substantive principle which applies in considering the government's motion is termed the rule of abatement."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000646.jpg
Quote #2
"when a convicted defendant dies while his direct appeal as of right is pending, his death abates not only the appeal, but also proceedings had during the course of the prosecution."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000646.jpg
Quote #3
"any restitution ordered as a result of that conviction must also abate, and it is also ruled the same with respect to associated forfeiture orders."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000646.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,566 characters)

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 53 Filed 09/03/19 Page 8 of 86 8
J8RsEPS1
1 the court's responsibility, and manifestly within its purview,
2 to ensure that the victims in this case are treated fairly and
3 with dignity.
4 The fundamental substantive principle which applies in
5 considering the government's motion is termed the rule of
6 abatement. This principle originated in the English common
7 law. It was adopted by most U.S. federal courts, but more
8 recently, it has faced some appropriate criticism. The rule of
9 abatement is best explained in the Second Circuit case of
10 U.S. v. Wright.
11 In that Wright case, two defendants had pled guilty to
12 embezzlement and tax evasion. Both defendants appealed, but
13 one of the defendants died while his appeal was pending in the
14 Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals rule that under the rule
15 of abatement, the judgment of conviction against the deceased
16 defendant was required to be vacated and the indictment was to
17 be dismissed. The Wright court held that when a convicted
18 defendant dies while his direct appeal as of right is pending,
19 his death abates not only the appeal, but also proceedings had
20 during the course of the prosecution.
21 The Second Circuit incidentally has also held that
22 when a criminal conviction abates upon the death of a
23 defendant, any restitution ordered as a result of that
24 conviction must also abate, and it is also ruled the same with
25 respect to associated forfeiture orders.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000646

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document