DOJ-OGR-00019811.jpg

1.38 MB

Extraction Summary

6
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket / case log
File Size: 1.38 MB
Summary

This document is a court docket log (Case 21-58) covering entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the filing of transcripts, a renewed motion for bail by Maxwell's defense (Christian Everdell), and the Court's order (Judge Alison Nathan) approving specific redactions to protect privacy interests and law enforcement integrity. The document also notes the Government's opposition to the bail application and the appearance of attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the USA.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the proceedings, filing for renewed bail application.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Presiding judge signing orders and reviewing bail applications.
Kristen Carannante Court Reporter/Transcriber
Filed official transcript of 7/14/2020 conference.
Kelly McGuirk Court Clerk/Filer
Entered transcript filings into the docket.
Christian R. Everdell Defense Attorney
Sent letter to Judge Nathan; filed Memorandum of Law in support of bail.
Andrew Rohrbach Attorney
Filed Notice of Appearance for USA (Prosecution).

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
USA
Plaintiff/Prosecution (represented by Andrew Rohrbach)
Second Circuit
Court of Appeals cited in case law (Lugosch v. Pyramid Co.)
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated in footer DOJ-OGR)
PACER
Public Access to Court Electronic Records system

Timeline (4 events)

07/14/2020
Conference held before Judge Alison J. Nathan
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan Kristen Carannante
12/08/2020
Defendant filed renewed application for bail under seal
Court
12/14/2020
Court Order adopting defendant's proposed redactions regarding bail application
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan Ghislaine Maxwell
12/16/2020
Government filed opposition to Maxwell's renewed bail application
Court
Government Ghislaine Maxwell

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location where transcript may be viewed

Relationships (3)

Ghislaine Maxwell Client/Attorney Christian R. Everdell
LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell... from Christian R. Everdell
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Judge Alison J. Nathan
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell... Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan
Andrew Rohrbach Attorney/Client USA
NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA

Key Quotes (3)

"The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019811.jpg
Quote #1
"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019811.jpg
Quote #2
"the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019811.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,766 characters)

Case 21-58, Document 23, 03/29/2021, 3065988, Page16 of 24
necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020)
12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)
12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)
12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are "judicial documents;" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. "Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) ("Amodeo II")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are "relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a "judicial document" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo ("Amodeo I"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020)
12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)
12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)
12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020)
12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on
DOJ-OGR-00019811

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document