DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg

564 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 564 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It records a dialogue between The Court and counsel Ms. Moe regarding the redaction of Exhibit 911, specifically debating whether to redact a painting over a mantel or a small photograph of an individual on a table. Ms. Moe agrees to unredact the painting and instead redact the photograph to protect potential privacy interests or witness identity.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Counsel
Attorney discussing redaction of exhibits with the Judge.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, instructing on exhibit redactions.
Unidentified Individual Subject of photograph
Person depicted in a photo within Exhibit 911 (on a table near a lamp marked D).

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Footer information.
DOJ
Bates stamp prefix (DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court proceedings regarding the redaction of exhibits, specifically Exhibit 911, prior to bringing in the jury.
Courtroom (Southern District)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court (likely SDNY based on context).

Relationships (1)

Ms. Moe Legal The Court
Attorney-Judge dialogue in court transcript.

Key Quotes (5)

"We'll bring in the jury."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg
Quote #1
"Counsel, was I right, those other 900 exhibits needed redaction of photos of individuals?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg
Quote #2
"We weren't sure whether the issue was the painting over the mantel -- we've redacted that -- or whether there was something else."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg
Quote #3
"Does it need to be redacted to protect privacy interests? I don't know -- for example, I don't know if this is a witness."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg
Quote #4
"We will unredact the painting and re-mark it to redact that photograph"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,596 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 197 of 261 1358
LC6VMAX6
1 We'll bring in the jury.
2 Counsel, was I right, those other 900 exhibits needed
3 redaction of photos of individuals?
4 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to those exhibits,
5 just so I'm sure I understand --
6 THE COURT: 911, for example. It looks like there's a
7 photo in the right corner.
8 MS. MOE: I just wanted to make sure we'd redacted the
9 right thing. I received a note about that issue.
10 We weren't sure whether the issue was the painting
11 over the mantel -- we've redacted that -- or whether there was
12 something else.
13 THE COURT: No. On the right-hand side there's a
14 table with a lamp. There's a lamp marked D and there's a photo
15 of -- I can't quite tell, but I'm sure if somebody looked
16 closely, they could tell of an individual.
17 MS. MOE: Oh, I see. Sorry, your Honor, I had not
18 noticed that. We will unredact the painting and re-mark it to
19 redact that photograph, if the Court requests.
20 THE COURT: Well, you tell me. Does it need to be
21 redacted to protect privacy interests? I don't know -- for
22 example, I don't know if this is a witness. I don't know.
23 MS. MOE: Apologies, your Honor. I'm not familiar
24 with the person in this photograph. I can't tell from the
25 photograph. We certainly have no objection to redacting it for
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018534

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document