DOJ-OGR-00017877.jpg
562 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (legal proceeding)
File Size:
562 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures an argument between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Court regarding the admissibility of a 'book' or 'list' (likely an address book) and whether it constitutes hearsay. Pagliuca argues that the government is offering the document to prove the truth of the matter asserted—specifically that the people listed had contact with 'underage females'—rather than for a non-hearsay purpose like notice.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Arguing regarding the admissibility of exhibits (books/lists) and hearsay objections.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, questioning the defense's arguments regarding authenticity and hearsay.
|
| The Jury | Fact Finder |
Mentioned as the body that would determine credibility of testimony.
|
| Underage females | Victims/Subjects |
Mentioned in relation to the government's theory about the list/book.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced regarding their legal theory and closing arguments.
|
|
| DOJ |
Referenced in Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
Unknown
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY) based on the court reporter and phone code (212).
|
Relationships (2)
Pagliuca arguing against the Government's theory and use of exhibits.
Defense attorney notes the government's theory connects the list to underage females.
Key Quotes (3)
"But it is being offered for the truth in my view: The truth that these people's names are in there; the truth that these people had some sort of contact."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017877.jpg
Quote #1
"This is all part and parcel of the government's theory that this list has something to do with, you know, underage females and their names are on the list, etc., etc."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017877.jpg
Quote #2
"I think it's a little fast and loose to say that it's not being offered for the truth. I mean, that's convenient to get around of the hearsay objection."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017877.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,543 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 4 of 228 680
LC2Qmax1
LC2Qmax1
1 book or even that particular book.
2 THE COURT: That's the factual dispute that goes to
3 authenticity, and then if it comes in, whether the jury
4 believes the testimony regarding that.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, but, you know, I think --
6 THE COURT: I gather the point here is there's nothing
7 from these exhibits that the government would argue at closing
8 the jury should conclude factually based on the statements
9 contained in either document.
10
11 MR. PAGLIUCA: See, I don't think that's true, your
12 Honor, and I think that's my next point because I think it's a
13 little fast and loose to say that it's not being offered for
14 the truth. I mean, that's convenient to get around of the
15 hearsay objection.
16 THE COURT: Sometimes it works.
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: Right.
18 THE COURT: Sometimes it doesn't.
19 MR. PAGLIUCA: But it is being offered for the truth
20 in my view: The truth that these people's names are in there;
21 the truth that these people had some sort of contact. This is
22 all part and parcel of the government's theory that this list
23 has something to do with, you know, underage females and their
24 names are on the list, etc., etc. So, I don't think you can
25 say this is being offered to show what, notice? It doesn't
2 THE COURT: That's the factual dispute that goes to
3 authenticity, and then if it comes in, whether the jury
4 believes the testimony regarding that.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, but, you know, I think --
6 THE COURT: I gather the point here is there's nothing
7 from these exhibits that the government would argue at closing
8 the jury should conclude factually based on the statements
9 contained in either document.
10
11 MR. PAGLIUCA: See, I don't think that's true, your
12 Honor, and I think that's my next point because I think it's a
13 little fast and loose to say that it's not being offered for
14 the truth. I mean, that's convenient to get around of the
15 hearsay objection.
16 THE COURT: Sometimes it works.
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: Right.
18 THE COURT: Sometimes it doesn't.
19 MR. PAGLIUCA: But it is being offered for the truth
20 in my view: The truth that these people's names are in there;
21 the truth that these people had some sort of contact. This is
22 all part and parcel of the government's theory that this list
23 has something to do with, you know, underage females and their
24 names are on the list, etc., etc. So, I don't think you can
25 say this is being offered to show what, notice? It doesn't
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017877
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document