This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the examination of a witness named Rodgers. The proceedings involve a discussion between the Court, Ms. Comey, and Mr. Everdell regarding the redaction of a name ('Carolyn') and phone numbers from evidence. Mr. Everdell also coordinates the placement of folders for the jury ahead of cross-examination, and the parties agree to discuss an 'in limine instruction' after the lunch break.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rodgers | Witness |
Mentioned in header as 'Rodgers - direct', indicating this is during direct examination.
|
| Carolyn | Subject of discussion |
Name mentioned regarding redactions of phone numbers and last names.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Discussing redactions and requesting time over the weekend.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding redactions and jury instructions.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (Defense) |
Discussing logistics for cross-examination materials (folders for jury).
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (Government) |
Stating the government has no objection to the in limine instruction.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by reporter name and case context (SDNY).
|
"We could do redactions of the last four, for example. Again, I understand it's labor, but do it now or do it later and, it seems to me, better to do it now."Source
"May we have the long weekend coming up as well to complete those redactions please?"Source
"One other choreography point just for purposes of cross, we do have folders for the jury."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,326 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document