This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a legal exchange between Ms. Sternheim (Defense) and Ms. Pomerantz (Prosecution) regarding an exhibit labeled 'Defendant's K-8' or '3513-019'. Ms. Pomerantz begins a legal argument citing the 'recorded recollection rule' as an exception to hearsay.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Discussing exhibit K-8 and providing the 3500 number to the prosecution.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Prosecutor (Government) |
Requesting exhibit identification and arguing a legal point regarding 'recorded recollection' and hearsay.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding exhibits and legal arguments.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Referenced by Ms. Sternheim ('I'm just showing the government').
|
|
| DOJ |
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by reporter name (likely SDNY given the case number context).
|
Complete text extracted from the document (1,133 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document