DOJ-OGR-00000525.jpg
614 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (bail hearing)
File Size:
614 KB
Summary
This document is page 15 of a transcript from a bail hearing filed on July 24, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The prosecutor argues that the defendant's financial disclosure is insufficient, unsworn, and fails to list accounts, currencies, or high-value assets like diamonds and art found during the search of his Manhattan mansion. The government further argues that the Manhattan mansion cannot be used as security for a bond because the government has already designated it for seizure.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Refers to Jeffrey Epstein (implied by case number 1:19-cr-00490); prosecution is arguing against his bail.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by the prosecutor; likely Judge Richard M. Berman based on case number suffix 'RMB'.
|
| Cosigners | Potential Sureties |
Individuals proposed by the defendant to secure the bail package.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Arguing against the defendant's bail application and noting asset seizure.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer as the transcription service.
|
|
| Financial Institutions |
Mentioned generally as missing from the defendant's disclosure list.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-07-24
Bail Hearing Argument
Courtroom (Southern District of New York)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Property owned by the defendant, searched by the government, and offered as security for a bond.
|
Relationships (1)
Government arguing against bail, designating property for seizure.
Key Quotes (4)
"It does nothing to identify high-value property such as diamonds or art, both of which were observed in abundance in just the government's search of his Manhattan mansion."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000525.jpg
Quote #1
"There are no bank records. There is nothing to validate this."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000525.jpg
Quote #2
"The defendant's financial disclosure form should alarm the Court, your Honor, not give it comfort..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000525.jpg
Quote #3
"Now, the government has already designated that property for seizure making it worthless to the defendant."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000525.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,601 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 15 of 74 15
1 It does not include a list of accounts. It does not
2 include a list of financial institutions. It does not identify
3 what types of currencies the defendant holds. It does nothing
4 to identify the location of his holdings. It does nothing to
5 identify high-value property such as diamonds or art, both of
6 which were observed in abundance in just the government's
7 search of his Manhattan mansion.
8 The other thing, your Honor, is we're just relying on
9 the defendant's word for all of this. This is not sworn. It's
10 not under penalty of perjury. There are no account statements.
11 There are no bank records. There is nothing to validate this.
12 That's not to say that if this were validated, that
13 this would somehow rise to the level of being granted bail, but
14 it's notable with respect to the presumption in particular and
15 also with respect to how the Court evaluates the defendant's
16 assets that we are relying on him.
17 The defendant's financial disclosure form should alarm
18 the Court, your Honor, not give it comfort that there are
19 conditions that would keep the defendant from fleeing and
20 prevent him from being a danger.
21 With respect to the proposed package, the defendant
22 proposes the Court accept his Manhattan mansion as security for
23 a bond. Now, the government has already designated that
24 property for seizure making it worthless to the defendant. He
25 proposes cosigners who couldn't possibly secure a package
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000525
1 It does not include a list of accounts. It does not
2 include a list of financial institutions. It does not identify
3 what types of currencies the defendant holds. It does nothing
4 to identify the location of his holdings. It does nothing to
5 identify high-value property such as diamonds or art, both of
6 which were observed in abundance in just the government's
7 search of his Manhattan mansion.
8 The other thing, your Honor, is we're just relying on
9 the defendant's word for all of this. This is not sworn. It's
10 not under penalty of perjury. There are no account statements.
11 There are no bank records. There is nothing to validate this.
12 That's not to say that if this were validated, that
13 this would somehow rise to the level of being granted bail, but
14 it's notable with respect to the presumption in particular and
15 also with respect to how the Court evaluates the defendant's
16 assets that we are relying on him.
17 The defendant's financial disclosure form should alarm
18 the Court, your Honor, not give it comfort that there are
19 conditions that would keep the defendant from fleeing and
20 prevent him from being a danger.
21 With respect to the proposed package, the defendant
22 proposes the Court accept his Manhattan mansion as security for
23 a bond. Now, the government has already designated that
24 property for seizure making it worthless to the defendant. He
25 proposes cosigners who couldn't possibly secure a package
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000525
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document