DOJ-OGR-00016966.jpg

542 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 542 KB
Summary

This document is page 40 of a court transcript from the trial US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Defense attorney Everdell and the Judge discuss specific wording amendments to jury instructions or the verdict form, specifically requesting that Count Four be specified as relating 'solely to Jane.' They also discuss a discrepancy between the federal statute age definition (under 18) and New York law (under 17) regarding the transport of minors.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Mr. Everdell Defense Attorney
Argues for specific wording changes in jury instructions regarding 'Jane' and age statutes.
The Court Judge
Presides over the hearing, approves changes to the text.
Mr. Rohrbach Prosecutor
States 'No objection' to the proposed change.
Jane Victim/Witness
Subject of 'Count Four'; defense argues the count relates solely to her.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting service listed in footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR footer).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) discussing legal text and jury instructions.
Southern District (New York)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Referenced in context of state law regarding age of consent/minor status.

Relationships (1)

Jane Legal Subject Count Four
"Count Four also relates solely to Jane."

Key Quotes (4)

"Count Four also relates solely to Jane."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016966.jpg
Quote #1
"That's been overruled, but we will ask that the word 'solely' be included on line 12"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016966.jpg
Quote #2
"knowingly transports any individual under the age of 18"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016966.jpg
Quote #3
"this is the issue with New York law being under the age of 17"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016966.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,336 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 40 of 95
2778
LCI1MAX1
1 MR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor.
2 Okay. Next page, your Honor?
3 THE COURT: Yes.
4 MR. EVERDELL: The next one we have is on page 26.
5 THE COURT: Okay.
6 MR. EVERDELL: We would reiterate, just for the
7 purposes of the record, of including "Jane" as opposed to "an
8 individual" or "the individual." That's been overruled, but we
9 will ask that the word "solely" be included on line 12, so,
10 "Count Four also relates solely to Jane."
11 MR. ROHRBACH: No objection.
12 THE COURT: Okay. We'll make that change. And my
13 clerk tells me we missed an "and foreign" on page 25.
14 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, yes. So we do have to go back to
15 page 25. So on line 5, there's an "or foreign."
16 THE COURT: So that will be with the ellipses. So
17 page 25, line 5, "interstate... commerce..."
18 MR. EVERDELL: Yes. And there's one other thing on
19 that page, your Honor, I forgot to mention.
20 THE COURT: Just a moment.
21 Okay. Go ahead.
22 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, on line 4 of that same
23 page, 25, I know it's a quote from the statute, which does say,
24 "knowingly transports any individual under the age of 18," but
25 this is the issue with New York law being under the age of 17,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016966

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document